Friday, April 1, 2016

John Oliver Examines the One Proposal that Trump has Actually Shared Anything on "HOW" He would Execute

      "I'm Going To Build A Wall, A GREAT Wall, It's Going To Be So GREAT, The BEST Wall Ever, and Mexico Is Going To Pay For It"  - Donald Trump

John A. Smith, Editor/Founder of this blog "Get Involved For A Better America" March 27, 2016

People Angry At "Bought And Paid For Politicians" and "Establishment"

     Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump has got people into a frenzy, and some have become violent, partly because he "says things the way they really are," according to the supporters. Granted that it has become painfully obvious that people, in general, both Republican and Democrats, are angry that politicians who accept very large donations from 1%er's and large corporations are indeed indebted to those contributors, and therefore laws are made to protect and assist them without any regard for the actual people that those politicians are supposed to be representing. Up to as many as 70% of people in polls have said they are disgusted with 1) Politicians who are bought and paid for by the rich and corporations, and 2) so called "establishment" politicians who "go along to get along" and whom just go through the motions of looking like they are representing their constituents but are actually working for their party and the large contributors. At times the obstructionists in the Republican party have threatened their own members with running someone against them in their next primary if they don't vote the way the party wants them to, which is against anything President Obama supports. With this being a fact, Trump has been able to soar in polls and get followers to vote for him in primaries. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has also inspired a number of young people to get involved in the political process because they want things to change. The number of people that show up at Senator Sanders rallies is astounding, and shows people want someone that is straight talking and for the people, not for the corporations and ultra rich. Sanders also is able to do the straight talk, and tell the truth. He is able to say what is on his mind because he has received over 6 million individual donations which average only $27 per donation. Sanders is not taking the kind of money from Wall Street and 1%er's like other candidates in the Presidential campaigns and does not have a Super PAC like Hillary Clinton (D-NY) whose Super PAC recently raised over $15M. He speaks the truth because he's not a puppet, and not beholden to 1%er's and large corporations. Sanders has been said to be organizing a "revolution" which is bringing a lot of young people into politics. That is why when there is a large voter turn out Bernie Sanders does very well. Hillary Clinton just took 5 days off her campaign for fundraising, fundraising from the 1%er's and corporations which people are unhappy about. This has lead to Trump making outrageous, unrealistic, false, statements and outright lies that he knows will get people riled up. He actually makes fun of his supporters, he has said things like "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any supporters." Not only are his proposals mostly unrealistic but are impossible to execute, unconstitutional, and require others to adhere to his ridiculous ideas  ("Mexico will pay for the wall"), which don't seem likely at all. His proposal to ban any Muslims from entering the country is just ridiculous because 1) every country that has flights to the United States would have to require Custom Agents to screen all passengers by asking them if they are Muslim. It isn't realistic to think that Mr. Trump would be able to get that kind of cooperation from all over the world to go along with his proposal. n if that happened, it never would, you would have to have the "Muslim" say they were Muslim. Who on earth thinks that an actual terrorist that is Muslim would answer "yes" to the question from a customs officer "Are you Muslim?" because the only way to know if someone is Muslim is by asking them; and 2) those passengers that were asked if they were Muslim would have to answer yes knowing that when they did they would be denied boarding! For a Muslim to say yes, he or she is a Muslim when they know they will not be able to board, especially a Muslim terrorist, is just not realistic and in fact absurd. It is truly insane to try to understand why people actually follow, and believe, Donald Trump. Knowing what we do about voters and the fact of why they are truly angry at the way things are we understand why people like to hear things that Trump blurts out, off the cuff, but to believe he could actually do what he proposes when he offers no actual ways of doing them is just dumb. Trump says all these things like his slogan "We will make America GREAT again, "the wall will be a GREAT wall," "Mexico will pay for the wall," "I will make the BEST deals and wipe out the bad deals that our leaders have made," but has rarely ever said HOW he would do any of it. Since one of the first things he said he would do is "build a wall" he has actually gotten pressed enough to give a few specifics about his idea of this wall. He said initially that the wall would cost "about $4B, they say $10B but it would only cost $4B if you know what your doing." And this is where John Oliver on "Last Week Tonight" on HBO Sundays at 10PM ET picks up the story.

John Oliver Examines the One Proposal That Trump has Actually Shared Any Specifics About - THE WALL

     Donald Trump said "the wall will cost about $4B, they say $10B but it will be $4B if you know what your doing." John Oliver started by saying "lets look at a serious proposal by a serious candidate seriously." Trump subsequently changed his estimates of what the wall would cost to: "the wall will cost about $6B; then he said the wall will cost $8B-$10B"; then to "the wall will cost maybe $12B." "Trump's margin of error is equal to the entire GDP of Moldova." said Oliver.

State flag of Moldova


     During a stump speech by Trump a child asked "what will the wall be made of"? Trump said that's a great question and brought the boy up on stage. His answer was "hardened concrete, reinforcement bars (rebar) and steel." Trump has given numerous statements about how tall the wall would be, he has answered anywhere from 35' to 90'. Actual estimates for a 35 foot wall, by experts, put the cost as follows: $10B for the concrete panels, $6B for steel and labor, $1B for footings, $2B to build roads so 20-ton trucks can get the materials to the site, and another 30% for design, engineering, and management. That puts the estimated cost at 2-6 times Trumps estimate, that's $25B. That's not worst thing. Two other factors are worse than the cost estimates, 1) The government has no buffer between the border and where the fence would be built (because a lot of the border is actually the Rio Grande river) causing the government to either have the land signed over by the property owners, or taken away from those property owners. That happened when GWB ordered a 700 mile fence. One couple was told they have to sign over 3/4 of their property, they said no, so the government used eminent domain and took their property. This same scenario happened many, many, times. 2) Studies showed that maintenance would pass the construction costs in seven years meaning the maintenance would cost more than $25B every seven years. In addition there are other problems. GWB signed a law to build the fence and allowed waived 36 laws allowing Homeland Security to ignore those laws. Laws like the "Endangered Species Act" and 35 others. While they were building the 700 mile wall the government unearthed graves, sacred burial grounds. Perhaps the biggest problem with the efficacy of the wall stopping illegal immigration is that more than half of illegal aliens entering the country do so by coming through actual controlled border points. They enter on work, and other visas and simply overstay their visas time. The next problem is that drug cartels build and use tunnels, and actually have devices to simply launch drugs over the wall, like a catapult.  

THIS IS TO RIDICULOUS TO EVEN WASTE MY TIME, THIS POST IS DONE.


Thursday, January 28, 2016

If One Party Puts Up a Candidate that is not “Bought and Paid For” the Other Party Better Do the Same



American people are at not only angry about the greedy 1%er’s and corporations but of politicians being bought and paid for, and elections being bought by the same. I google searched “American Greed in Politics” and chose this one, by Magnitsky Act | Voices from Russia.  This became my single image. My fear is that the one constant in all of the polls both Republican and Democratic is that they show, I believe, 70%+ of people don’t want an “establishment” candidate nor one who is indebted to the wealthiest 1% of people in the country, or corporations. They like people who can speak their mind or the truth and their own positions. Hence you get a Donald Trump who certainly fits the bill of saying anything he wants speaking his mind because he owes no one as far as he is not accepting donations from the rich or corporations. What astounds me is that people buy into things like “banning all Muslims” or any of the other racist, narcissistic, hateful, divisive, crap that comes out of his mouth. My real fear is that the DNC is trying to destroy any chance Bernie Sanders has of being the Democratic nominee who is the other candidate drawing large crowds. Hillary, an “establishment” candidate whom has many ties to Wall Street, 1%er’s, corporations, as well as support from Debbie Wassermann-Schultz and the DNC, Super Delegates, and more working to make her the Democratic nominee. Here’s the problem, 70%+ DO NOT WANT someone from the “establishment” or someone who is perceived to be, or actually is, “bought and paid for.” Therefore, if Donald Trump wins the Republican nomination, which it now looks like he has a good chance of doing, and Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, which with “the fix” possibly being in, Trump will get the White House. People are so angry at “establishment” politicians and those who are indebted to the 1%er’s and corporations that they WILL NOT VOTE, or at least will not vote for Hillary Clinton. The Democrats best chance to win the White would be to nominate the person drawing 13,000 people to hear him speak in Arizona. I mention that because John McCain (R-AZ) was on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, (I think it was) last night, and said that Bernie had drawn that many to an event in Arizona and that even though he’s been one of their politicians for 25 years HE could not draw 13,000 people to an event. If Donald Trump wins the Republican nomination then the Democrats better not put up a candidate that has been bought and paid for.  They better make the Republicans #FeelTheBern if they don't want to lose The White House.

Sunday, September 20, 2015

Do You Believe Corporations That Move Their Headquarters Overseas to Avoid Paying U.S. Taxes Should Get Gov't Contracts?

Bills in House and Senate to Stop Corporations That Have Moved Headquarters Overseas to Avoid Paying U.S. Taxes From Getting Government Contracts;

NOW is the Time To Act!

Bills in the House and Senate

H.R. 1809 "No Contracts For Corporate Deserters Act of 2015 was introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives (Congress) by Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro on 4/15/2015. It is currently in the Armed Services Committee. That is why it is NOW that you should contact YOUR Congressman or Congresswoman and call or e-mail them and tell them you support H.R. 1809 and want their support. In your call or e-mail ask them directly "will you support this bill" after you tell them you want it passed. To FIND and/or CONTACT YOUR Congressman or Congresswoman simply go to : https://www.congress.gov/ and enter your zip code. You will be given YOUR Congress Representatives name and contact information. If you send an e-mail you will receive a letter (albeit a form letter) stating your Representatives position, of which you can respond to. You will know if your Representatives supports the bill or not. But more importantly your Representative will know that their constituents are tracking this legislation and that it matters in the next election. Please do this now and contact your friends and share this information. The more calls and e-mails, the better to let our Congressman and Congresswoman that we don't want corporations that move their headquarters overseas to avoid paying taxes get government contracts.

S.169 "No Tax Write-Offs For Corporate Wrongdoers Act was introduced on 1/13/2015 by Patrick J. Leahy (D-VT) and is the equivalent of H.R.1809 in the House of Representatives. Please FIND/CONTACT YOUR U.S. Senators by going to http://senate.gov/. It is not write that corporations put a building in another country and call it their "World Headquarters" and therefore are able to not pay taxes on billions of dollars in profits by doing business in America. 

Track These Bills, Track YOUR Representatives

One very easy way to find and let your Representatives know how you feel about a bill is POPVOX located at: https://popvox.com/   Register at this site and it will give you who YOUR Congressman or Congresswoman is and who YOUR 2 U.S. Senators are. Once registered you can search for legislative bills or simply type the number of the bill in. Below I show screenshots of what you can expect once you register. Please click on the link above, register, and put in your information so that POPVOX will show you your Representatives, then one at a time type in H.R. 1809 and follow through the prompts for "I Support This Bill" and it will register your support in the poll and automatically send YOUR Representatives both in Congress and the Senate a message showing you support the bill, and even let you add your personal comments. Take a look at this easy process that I just completed to let MY Congressman and U.S. Senators know how I feel:

STEP ONE: Click on this link, POPVOX then under "It's Your Voice" enter your information to register:

Click on https://popvox.com/ and register under "It's Your Voice


STEP TWO: Type in H.R. 1809 (you'll do this once for the House bill and again for the Senate bill S.169.)
Type H.R. 1809 for the House bill, when finished go back to your Dashboard and type in S.169 to send your message to your U.S. Senators


STEP THREE: Click on the bill you want to respond to:

Just Click on the bill you wish to vote on/Support


STEP FOUR: Click on "I Support This Bill" you will then be given a chance to add your personal information so that POPVOX will figure out who your Congress is and send them your message. The message that will automatically be sent to YOUR Congressman or Congresswoman when you are done:



 STEP FIVE: You will be given an opportunity to add to a message supplied:

If you wish, add your comments to the message already supplied by POPVOX





STEP SIX: Go back to your Dashboard and type in the "Search Bill by Number or Keyword and type in S.169 and repeat above steps to have your message automatically sent to YOUR 2 U.S. Senators. When your done go to your "Profile" and you will see YOUR Congressperson and YOUR two U.S. Senators. You can now "Track" your Representatives and receive information whenever they Sponsor or Co-Sponsor a bill or vote on a bill.
 
Your Profile showing YOUR Representatives


That's it! You have now acted on your position. Thank you for being active in telling our Politicians that we are tired of them acting in the best interests of corporations and the richest of the rich. You should feel that you've accomplished something, because you have!

Another great website to FIND/TRACK YOUR REPRESENTATIVES IS GovTrack. It's another very easy to use site that will help you find, and contact, YOUR Representatives, track voting records and bills, and let your Representatives know that you are paying attention of what they are doing.

GovTrack is another great site to FIND/CONTACT and TRACK YOUR REPRESENTATIVES

Thank you for being an active citizen that cares enough to communicate with you Representatives. If you would like to get important information please "Like" my Facebook page Stop the Obstructionist Tea Party and "Subscribe" to this/my blog: "Get Involved For A Better America

 Be sure to "Subscribe" to not miss any important bills or information that might concern you! On the left sidebar "Sign Up For E-mails" and/or Sign up through a reader." 

Subscribe for e-mails and/or through a reader


How to Find and Contact your Representatives

To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR State
​ and Local Legislators enter your
​Address and ​
Zip Code at:

Open States: http://openstates.org/find_your_legislator/


To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR U.S. Congressmen/women enter your Zip Code at:

​Congress.gov: https://www.congress.gov/


To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR U.S. Senators enter your Zip Code at:

​Senate.gov:  http://senate.gov/

     I have provided the links above to assist you in finding and contacting YOUR Representatives simply by typing in your zip code
​ (or address and Zip Code for your local and State politicians)​
at those sites. By contacting them by phone or e-mail you will let them know that you ARE paying attention to what they are doing, and what YOU want them to do.

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court Said "Gerrymander" is NOT O.K., Now What?

You Must Act To Stop Gerrymandering Now!

The U.S. Supreme Court Has Decided Gerrymandering is Wrong - Now You Must Take Advantage

John A. Smith, August 25, 2015

     On July 29, 2015, four days after the U.S. Supreme Court voted in favor of gay marriage and upheld "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (aka "Obamacare") for the 2nd time, they ruled in favor of the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission.  They were being sued by the Republican controlled Arizona State Legislature over who had the right to draw the "Voting District" boundary lines in  Arizona State Legislature v Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission . But if people don't take action to take the advantages of that decision it won't mean anything.

     The reason how the lines are drawn is so important is because the Republicans are in control of a majority of states. As a result of the 2012 elections, the Republicans were in control of a majority of states with 30 gubernatorial offices and 27 state legislatures. The Democrats held 19 governorships and have the majority in 18 legislatures. Now, in 2015 there are 31 Republican Governors, 35 Republican controlled State Senates, and 34 State Houses of Representatives. The Republicans have full control in 27 states. "Click" or "Tap" here to see who controls YOUR state. They found another way to cheat in the election process. If you look at the next section, "Gerrymandering" is explained, with an example given. Basically, knowing how certain neighborhoods, minorities, and other groups, are going to vote, the Republican controlled  Legislatures draw the voting district lines so that even though everyone is still going to vote the way they are going to vote, the Republicans would actually "pick-up" districts that they wouldn't have without cheating with gerrymandering. See the example below.

An example of Gerrymandering: On the left district lines are drawn geographically, each party has equal chance for the vote. The "Pink Party" wins all 4 districts (or Counties). On the right, lines have been redrawn, "gerrymandered" and the pink dot party will win only 3 out of 4 districts, the "Green Party" wins a district (or County) that it wouldn't have otherwise won.  When enough districts are won through gerrymandering it sometimes causes that party to win all the electoral votes for that state!

Gerrymandering:

 An example of Gerrymandering: In the above illustration you have an example of let's say a county. the county has 4 voting districts. The lines show how voting district lines may appear before and after gerrymandering, Before gerrymandering each of the 4 voting districts in the county on the left have 8 "Pink" neighborhoods, and 7 "Green" neighborhoods. Therefore the pink party would win all voting districts. On the right we have the same county, only the 4 voting district's lines have been "Redrawn" or "Gerrymandered." If you notice the "Green Party" will now win one of the districts, heavily in fact (14-2), and the "Pink" party would only win 3 voting districts. Therefore the "Green" party just stole a district, heavily, by gerrymandering, or, "redrawing" the lines. In this example none of the neighborhoods (or expected voters) changed, just how the district lines were drawn changed. Now, if you had a where you have an equal number of voting districts for Republicans, and for Democrats, and you redrew the lines to gerrymander even one district, you would cause all of the electoral votes to go to the party that did the gerrymandering. That would give any national politician a win by cheating! That's right, The President, and 2 U.S. Senators for each state could be decided by gerrymandering, even though the number of people voting, and their votes didn't change at all. Right now there are 38 States that have Republican Governors and almost as many Republican State Legislatures. The State Legislatures are drawing the "Voting District" lines in many of those states, and that is where the gerrymandering is being done. The U.S. Supreme Court decided on July 29th of this year in favor of the "Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission" the defendant, in a case where the "Arizona State Legislature" the plaintiff, sued to have the right to have the State Legislature draw the lines and do away with the Independent Redistricting Commission. The U.S. Supreme Court said that having an Independent Commission drawing the voting district lines is constitutional and fair. 

     Now it's up to the states that don't have an Independent Redistricting Commission, or one that has the authority to draw the voting district lines, to get a commission in place, with the authority it needs to draw those all important lines. So, the U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for gerrymandering to end, but it's up to the voters in each of those states to do their part. Do you live in a state where a Republican State Legislature is drawing the voting district lines? Here is a complete list of states showing who is controlling YOUR State Legislature "Tap" or "Click" here for the 2015 State Governors and Legislatures. The State Legislatures are made up of State Senators, and the State House of Representatives (or Assemblymen). The "House" (or Assembly) and "Senate" IS the State Legislature. When you click the link above, if your state is shaded in gray on that list, you live in a state where the Republicans are controlling your State Legislature. You should contact your State Senators office, and your State Legislators (Assemblymen), and ask them if there is an "Independent Commission" in charge of drawing district voting lines. If not, tell them you want an independent commission in charge of drawing the voting district lines. Look for, or start, a petition to get an independent commission to draw the district voting lines in your state. Here is how you can find out who YOUR State Senators and Legislators are, AND how to contact them. Please do this NOW if you are in one of the gray shaded states on the list.  Click HERE to Find YOUR State Assemblyman and State Senator by typing in your address HERE .

This is Where You Come In

     "Tap" or "Click" on this link 2015 Governors and Legislatures  to see who your Governor is as well as how many Republicans (Red) and Democrats (Blue) are in your State Senate and your State House of Representatives (or Assembly). If you live in one of the 32 states that are controlled by Republicans chances are you may have gerrymandering happening in your state. You probably also have Voter ID (disenfranchising) Laws being signed into law, but that's the next post, followed by "Money in Politics." 

     If you live in a state where gerrymandering is taking place, to take advantage of the U.S. Supreme Court decision you must do the following:

1)   See who draws the lines for the voting districts in your State.

2)   If your State Legislature is drawing the lines you must CONTACT your State Senators, and Representatives (whether it's State House of Representatives or State Assembly) and tell them you are in favor of an "Independent Redistricting Commission" to draw "Voting District" lines as approved by the U.S. Supreme Court on July 29, 2015. At the end of this post there are links for you to FIND and CONTACT your Representatives by entering your Zip Code, or for State and Local politicians you enter your Zip Code and Address. These links give you everyone that represents you in Government. Also you may want to start a petition (look for an activist group in your area, you'll probably find one that is already fighting gerrymandering and can tell you how you can help) to demand that an Independent Redistricting Commission be formed to draw redistricting lines.

3)   If you find that there is an Independent Redistricting Commission make sure they have the permanent authority to draw the voting district lines. If they don't start a petition, and contact your Representatives to tell them you want that commission to have the permanent authority to draw the voting district lines.

THAT'S IT! YOU CAN STOP THE ELECTION PROCESS FROM BEING CHEATED!
       

Let YOUR Representatives Know What YOU Think

To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR State
​ and Local Legislators enter your
​Address and ​
Zip Code at:

Open States: http://openstates.org/find_your_legislator/


To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR U.S. Congressmen/women enter your Zip Code at:
​Congress.gov: https://www.congress.gov/


To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR U.S. Senators enter your Zip Code at:
​Senate.gov:  http://senate.gov/

     I have provided the links above to assist you in finding and contacting YOUR Representatives simply by typing in your zip code
​ (or address and Zip Code for your local and State politicians)​
at those sites. By contacting them by phone or e-mail you will let them know that you ARE paying attention to what they are doing, and what YOU want them to do.

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

We Can Block Fox News Affiliates From Renewing Their Broadcast Licenses - Part 2

Tuesday, August 4, 2015, John A. Smith, Author/Editor

Now Is The Time For You To Take Action To Stop Fox From Spreading Lies

If you haven't already please see "Part 1" of this article from Monday, July 15, 2015 by clicking or tapping this link:

We Can Block Fox News Affiliates From Renewing Their Broadcast Licenses - Part 1

Fox News Misleads, Lies, and Fabricates Information and Totally Takes Away Voters Ability To Make An "Informed Decision" At The Voting Booths

 

      Americans have a "Right" to vote in our democracy. But, as pointed out in part 1, in the Brave New Films 2004 Documentary Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism, that right is being taken away in many ways:

Citizens United has put our ELECTIONS and POLITICIANS up FOR SALE!

Money in Politics

The Koch Brothers, other 1%er's, corporation's lobbyists, are spending hugh amounts of their money to lie to you. And maybe most importantly, the lies, misinformation, and flat out fabrications, that are aired on TV, in print media, and radio, (sometimes in the disguise as "news") are confusing potential voters and taking away their ability to make "informed decisions." In addition to owning and controlling news media, networks, and cable stations, are inundated with ads bought with the sole intention of pushing the agenda of the wealthy and greedy. Ads paid for by the super rich, and corporations, are also the people buying our politicians and elections, which is why we need to get money out of politics.  These are all factors causing voters to be so confused when they get to the voting booth, IF they get to the voting booth. Many people are so fed up with voting in general because they hear such diabolically opposed statements they don't know what to believe. Then, once the politicians do get elected and get into office they have to pay back the people and corporations that bought them. Nothing changes for the people struggling and working to try to better their lives.  An example of people voting someone into office that promised he would do right by the people was Scott Walker (R-WI). Almost immediately after he took office he took away unions rights to engage in "collective bargaining." The residents of the state were shocked and angry. That motivated people to gather over 1,000,000 signatures (not an easy task) on a petition to "Recall" him and force a recall election. But when the recall election was held so much "Outside Money" (money contributed to him from people and corporations that don't even reside in the state!) was given to Walker's campaign in that recall election and he won! That is insane. It shows how people are mislead on what the truth is when a lot of money in spent in the media. Somehow because Walker's campaign was able to outspend his opponents (with that money that came in from OUT OF STATE) on TV ads that people believed what they kept seeing on TV over and over and voted for him! Let's not forget the most important thing that money in politics is doing, that is that it is buying our politicians, and, buying our elections. Fox News and Rupert Murdoch is a big player in the destruction of our democracy. Politicians and elections are being bought. One thing that has to happen to slow down money in politics is that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in "Citizen's United" has to be overturned. To do this a Constitutional Amendment has to be passed. So far 16 states have passed resolutions toward that end and in the meantime limit the damage from Citizen's United as much as they can. Does your state have a resolution to overturn Citizen's United? Contact your Representatives, look for groups in your area fighting for a state resolution to overturn Citizens United. We can also do something about the damage money in politics is doing. I will explain exactly what we can do later in this article. I hope you take part in taking back our democracy.




Gerrymandering:

 An example of Gerrymandering: In the above illustration you have an example of let's say a county, the county has 4 voting districts. The lines show how voting district lines may appear before and after gerrymandering, Before gerrymandering each of the 4 voting districts in the county on the left have 8 "Pink" neighborhoods, and 7 "Green" neighborhoods. Therefore the pink party would win all voting districts all of the electoral votes for the entire county would go to the pink party. On the right we have the same county, only the 4 voting district's lines have been "Redrawn" or "Gerrymandered." If you notice the "Green Party" will now win one of the districts, heavily in fact (14-2), and the "Pink" party would only win 3 voting districts. Therefore the "Green" party just stole a district, heavily, by gerrymandering, or, "redrawing" the lines. In this example none of the neighborhoods changed, just how the district lines were drawn changed. If you continued this process in hundreds of counties the green party would win a number of districts by gerrymandering, cheating. Right now there are 38 States that have Republican Governors and almost as many Republican State Legislatures. The State Legislatures are drawing the "Voting District" lines in many of those states, and that is where the gerrymandering is being done. The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided in favor of the "Arizona Independent Redistricting Committee" the defendant, in a case where the "Arizona State Legislature" the plaintiff, sued to have the right to have the State Legislature draw the lines and do away with the independent commission. The U.S. Supreme court said that having an independent commission drawing the voting district lines is constitutional. Now it's up to the states that don't have independent commissions drawing those lines to form one, and to vote on having an independent commission draw the voting district lines. So, the U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for gerrymandering to end, but it's up to the voters in each of those states to do their jobs. Do you live in a state where a Republican State Legislature is drawing the voting district lines? Here is a complete list of states showing who is controlling YOUR State Legislature 2015 State Governors and Legislatures. The State Legislatures are made up of State Senators, and the State House of Representatives (Assemblymen). The "House" and "Senate" IS the State Legislature, who could be drawing the voting district lines. Click on the link above for the list of State Legislatures, if your state is shaded in gray on that list, you live in a state where the Republicans are controlling your State Legislature. You should contact your State Senators office, and your State Legislators (Assemblymen), and ask them if there is an "Independent Commission" in charge of drawing district voting lines. If not, tell them you want an independent commission in charge of drawing the voting district lines. Look for, or start, a petition to get an independent commission to draw the district voting lines in your state. Here is how you can find out who YOUR State Senators and Legislators are, AND how to contact them. Please do this NOW if you are in one of the gray shaded states on the list. Find YOUR State Assemblyman and State Senator by typing in your address HERE




Voter ID (Suppression) Laws

     In a March 2015 Huffington Post article "Colin Powell Has A Pretty Good Suggestion For Fixing Voter ID Laws" Former Secretary of State Colin Powell said that "black voters should vote for lawmakers who support voter ID restrictions out of office."

     Powell, who served as Secretary of State under George W. Bush, said that he was troubled by the voter ID laws, but that they were "hurdles that we can get over." "What I say to my friends in the African-American community, is whatever those states do, you meet the standards and then you make sure you register," Powell said during an interview on ABC's "This Week." "You make sure you vote. You make sure you vote for the people who tried to put these barriers, these hurdles in your way and then you vote them out."
     
Excerpt from an article in 2014, The American Prospect,
"Voter Suppression: How Bad? (Pretty Bad)

     "For the first time in decades, voters in nearly half the country will find it harder to cast a ballot in the upcoming elections. Voters in 22 states will face tougher rules than in the last midterms. In 15 states, 2014 is slated to be the first major election with new voting restrictions in place.
These changes are the product of a concerted push to restrict voting by legislative majorities that swept into office in 2010. They represent a sharp reversal for a country whose historical trajectory has been to expand voting rights and make the process more convenient and accessible."

     In fact, how bad is "Voter Impersonation at the Ballot Box" needing all these "Voter ID" laws? Well, when you take into account that the Republicans, who have actually pushed these laws through have spent a significant amount of money to investigate it, and only found thirty-one (31) cases out of over one billion 1,000,000,000 votes, I would say "Voter ID" laws are not needed at all, so they must be making the laws for another reason. Turns out they are, if you look at the actual laws and who they target, it is quite easy to see that they are "disenfranchising" certain voters. That is, making it harder for certain people to vote. How you ask? By demanding a State ID of which you need a birth certificate to get, it can be a problem, especially if you no longer live in the state you were born in. On average it costs about $30.00 to obtain that certificate, if you can find everything they require to get it in the first place. Some have said to me "States give you a free picture State ID." Nah, not true. In the last election cycle Pennsylvania was supposed to give out free State ID's at the DMV. But the State Legislature literally changed the rules needed on a daily basis for a 2 week period. It was so confusing that the employees at the DMV had no idea what do so they just told people they weren't giving out State ID's. This was shown in an investigative piece on 60 Minutes. When the legislator was interviewed about why the rules were changed so frequently, he said, that's the way it is.

     The ACLU says in an article "Fighting Voter ID Requirements" Since 2008, states across the country have passed measures to make it harder for Americans—particularly black people, the elderly, students, and people with disabilities—to exercise their fundamental right to cast a ballot. Over 30 states have considered laws that would require voters to present a government-issued photo ID in order to vote. Studies suggest that up to 11 percent of American citizens lack such an ID and would be required to navigate the administrative burdens to obtain one or forego the right to vote entirely.

     It was the  Washington Post in an August, 2014 article "A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast" that actually investigated the number of actual cases that had been reported. Let's face it, the Republican Governors and Republican-controlled State Legislatures have created numerous laws for a non-problem so they could disenfranchise voters that they feel would not vote for them.

Finally, How Media Influences Voters

     So, if you read Part 1 of this article, and/or watch the Brave New Films documentary Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism (link above)you already see how over 300 million Americans get the misinformation and lies that Fox News shows and prints in their empire. Other media outlets owned and controlled by people with an agenda, such as that of Rupert Murdoch add to the confusion to voters. This is why I decided to try to do something. That something, I found out was to Petition the FCC to not renew the licenses of Fox affiliates. I researched this possibility and found this:

     Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW) has already started this process in the Washington and Maryland areas. The process is spelled out in their Fox FCC Petition FAQ.   In their petition to the FCC CREW asked the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) not to renew the broadcast licenses of three Fox television stations, two in D.C. and one in Maryland. They asked for this based on this: "Under the law and FCC regulations, all broadcast licensees must be of good character. Two separate British inquiries have concluded both Rupert and James Murdoch turned a blind eye to the illicit activities at News Corp and one found Rupert Murdoch is not fit to run an international company. If the Murdoch's lack good character in Britain, they must lack it in the U.S. as well. Character doesn’t change on the other side of the Atlantic.You can read the evidence they produced in the link above (FAQ) which includes evidence of "Bad Character" in the United States "Conduct in the U.S. includes allegations of hacking phones of 9/11 victims and illegally gaining access to the password-protected system of a company News Corp. was trying to acquire."

     The next steps were: " In response to CREW’s petition, the FCC must determine (1) if facts alleged are true, could a reasonable fact finder conclude Fox lacks the requisite good character; and (2) does CREW’s petition present substantial and material questions? If the answer to both is yes, the FCC is required to hold an evidentiary hearing on whether Fox possesses the requisite character to continue to hold broadcast licenses. At that hearing, Fox will have the burden of proving it is entitled to renewal of its licenses, and CREW will have the opportunity to present evidence and witnesses to rebut that proof."

     If the FCC grant's CREW's petition in that case, Fox would lose three licenses in D.C. and Baltimore: WTTG, WDCA, and WUTB. In addition, CREW would have grounds to argue the licenses of all of Fox News Corp. subsidiaries in the U.S. should be revoked. If the FCC denied their petition in that case, CREW could file an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

     This is the actual "License Renewal Process for Television Broadcast Stations" from the FCC. To actually petition the FCC to deny the license of an affiliate, which is different than petitioning to deny a broadcast license, requires you to have legal standing. To have legal standing you have to say you are "a regular watcher" of the station.

     What I'm suggesting is that each of you start a petition online for the denial of the Fox affiliate's license for the area you are in. The basis will be that you have been damaged due to the Fox affiliate in your area has misrepresented and lied to you, the public, while calling their material "News." Rupert Murdoch admitted that what Fox produces is "entertainment", not news, when he called the watchers of Fox "Morons" and "White Trash," (see part 1 of this article.)

Fox News is "Entertainment" Says Rupert Murdoch- Problem? Many Fox News Watchers That He Called "Morons" and "White Trash" Take It As "Fair and Balanced" News

      Start today! Start a petition. Contact your Representatives and tell them you want the Fox affiliate's license in your area denied in it's renewal process! We especially need to reach the people in areas where all they hear is Bulls**t from Fox under the supervision of the Koch Brothers, the other 1%er's, and the corporations. Remember that in many areas the only "news" people see is produced by Fox and other conservative based media. Remember that 14 year old boy from New York that was kept in a coffin by his parents until someone found out and the reporter said to him "why didn't you tell anyone what your parents were doing to you? His answer, "I thought everyone's parents kept their kids in a coffin." 


To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR State Legislators enter your
​Address and ​
Zip Code at:

Open States: http://openstates.org/find_your_legislator/

To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR U.S. Congressmen/women enter your Zip Code at:

https://www.congress.gov/

To FIND, and CONTACT, YOUR U.S. Senators enter your Zip Code at:

http://senate.gov/

     I have provided the links above to assist you in finding and contacting YOUR Representatives simply by typing in your zip code at those sites. By contacting them by phone or e-mail you will let them know that you ARE paying attention to what they are doing, and what YOU want them to do.