Friday, December 13, 2013

House Passes Budget 332-94 -- Groups (Heritage Action, Club for Growth, and Freedom Works) Attack Boehner, Ryan

Speaker of the House John Boehner and House Majority Leader Paul Ryan Denounce "Outside Groups"

Photo by abcnews.go.com
 WASHINGTON: Thursday the House of Representatives passed a 2-year budget deal worked out by House Majority Leader Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Senator Patty Murray (D-WA,) Chairwomen of the Senate Budget Committee. The vote was 332-94 with 162 Republicans voting "Aye" and only 62 Republicans defecting, which surprised Congressman Paul Ryan because of all the the flack he has been taking over the last few days. Democrats voting for the bill were 163, and against were 32. When Speaker John Boehner was asked about the "outside groups" denouncing the bill, he responded "what, the groups that were against it before they knew what was in it?"

 Boehner this week said conservative groups had “lost all credibility” by opposing the budget pact before it was even released. He said the activist organizations are “using our members, and they’re using the American people for their own goals.”

 The bill is now in the Senate and to it, all 55 Democrats and 5 Republicans have to vote "Aye." Not having to worry about government shutdowns for the next 2 years doesn't sit well with the ultra-rich and Super PACS that like to use shutting down the government as a tactic.

 Kudos to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH,) House Majority Leader Paul Ryan (R-WI,) and Senate Budget Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-WA.) $62B in sequester cuts stopped, $1.012 Trillion in spending, Federal Employees hired after Jan. 1, 2014 will have to contribute 1.03% more to their healthcare costs. The deal doesn't make either side very happy (which is a good sign that it is a good compromise,) and it doesn't cut the deficit a great deal. But, it's start, and at .least there won't be another government shutdown for the next two years. Perhaps they can get something else done, like immigration reform, income inequality, minimum wage, woman's rights, Voter ID/disenfranchisement of Voters, financial reform, JOBS, and so much more.

 The rebuke was a clear shot at Heritage Action for America, the Club for Growth, FreedomWorks and other conservative groups that have proven adept at drumming up conservative opposition to legislation.

Heritage Action (for America), Club For Growth, Freedom Works

Photo by prwatch.org
Heritage Foundation by globalastrology.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Heritage Action (for America)

Photo by southflorida912.org

 Heritage Action (for America) CEO Michael Needham said on Thursday, “The Speaker is trying to turn this into a boring fight between outside groups and himself so we are not having a policy debate about whether or not this is a good deal.” The House approved the budget deal 332-94 on Thursday. On Friday, Needham said "Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) is picking a fight with outside conservative groups to clear the way for immigration reform."

 In October of 2013, Needham admitted "under intense questioning" that Heritage Action was "not being transparent" with their donors as they have generally declined to disclose who their donors are. [25] One exception to this is a donation from conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch: they donated half a million dollars in October of 2013. [26]

 "Heritage Action," is a conservative policy advocacy organization, founded in 2010. It works with citizen activists nationwide to generate support for legislation in the U.S. Congress.[1] The organization is a sister organization of the conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation.[2][3] Heritage Action has been called a "powerhouse in a new generation of conservative groups"[4] and "perhaps now the most influential lobby group among Congressional Republicans."[5] The Heritage Foundation is not allowed to back pieces of legislation due to its 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. Heritage Action fulfills this role and provides a link between the think tank and grassroots conservative activists.[7]  The organization played an instrumental role in the government shutdown of October 2013.[17][18] While the shutdown was ongoing Heritage Action continued to urge lawmakers not to negotiate a measure to fully fund the government without dismantling the ACA.[16] The strategy of Heritage Action in tying the ACA to the shutdown, according to Needham, was to make President Obama "feel pain" because of the shutdown. [19] Senator Orrin Hatch criticized Heritage for warning legislators not to vote for the Senate budget compromise during the government shutdown of 2013:


Club for Growth

Photo by bergetoons.blogspot.com


 "Club For Growth," Club President Chris Chocola said “Apparently, there are some Republicans who don’t have the stomach for even relatively small spending reductions that are devoid of budgetary smoke and mirrors.” The conservative Club for Growth on Wednesday came out against the budget deal struck by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), before the deal was even made public or voted on. This is what Speaker John Boehner was talking about when he was a question by a reporter about "outside groups" opposing the measure and said "what, the groups that were against it before they knew what was in it?"


The Club for Growth is a fiscally conservative 501(c)4 organization active in the United States of America, with an agenda focused on cutting taxes and other economic issues.[2] In 2010, the Club’s political arms spent about $8.6 million directly on candidates and bundled another $6 million from Club members and directed those funds to candidates.[6] In 2012, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, Club members donated at least $4 million and the Club’s political arms spent nearly $18 million on elections.[7]

The Club has two political arms: an affiliated traditional Political Action Committee called the Club for Growth PAC and Club for Growth Action, an independent-expenditure only committee or Super-PAC. According to its website, the Club for Growth's policy goals include cutting income tax rates, repealing the estate tax, limited government and a Balanced Budget Amendment, entitlement reform, free trade, tort reform, school choice, and deregulation.[3] The Club for Growth PAC endorses and raises money for fiscally conservative candidates.

The Club said it would key vote against the agreement, meaning votes in favor of the agreement would be counted against lawmakers on the group’s annual scorecard.


Freedom Works


Photo by freedomworks.org


"Freedom Works" originated from a conservative political group funded by David H. Koch called Citizens for a Sound Economy, which in 2004 split into Americans for Prosperity, led by President Nancy Pfotenhauer, and a remainder group which merged with Empower America and was renamed FreedomWorks, led by President and CEO Matt Kibbe.[4] 


In 2009, FreedomWorks responded to the growing number of Tea party protests across the United States, and became one of several groups active in the "Tea Party" tax protests.[19] Among other activities, FreedomWorks runs boot camps for supporters of Republican candidates. FreedomWorks spent over $10 million on the 2010 elections on campaign paraphernalia alone. The required reading list for new employees includes Saul Alinsky,[20] Frédéric Bastiat and Ayn Rand.[21] Rolling Stone and Talking Points Memo allege that FreedomWorks helps run the Tea Party Patriots.[22][23] Tea Party Patriots denies this claim.[24] According to a 2010 article in the New York Times, FreedomWorks "has done more than any other organization to build the Tea Party movement."[21]

In the 2010 congressional elections, FreedomWorks endorsed a number of candidates, including Marco Rubio, Pat Toomey, Mike Lee, and Rand Paul.[25] In addition to the aforementioned United States Senate candidates, FreedomWorks endorsed 114 candidates for federal office, of whom seventy won election,[26] an independent study performed by Brigham Young University showed that only FreedomWorks's endorsement had a statistically significant impact on the success of a candidate in the General Election (U.S.).

These Groups Speaking Out Against This Budget are the Reason We All Need To Join The Effort To Get Citizens United Overturned

Photo by occupyventura805.wordpress.com

 

 

Photo by theblogismine.com


















Sixteen states have already passed resolutions to get the Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment to overturn Supreme Courts 2010 decision regarding Citizens United. To find an organization or join the effort to overturn the 2010 Citizen United Supreme Court decision go to United For The People . Citizens United allows corporations, the ultra-rich, and Super PACS, like the organizations above have formed. if you noticed the organizations set up 501c4's, non-profit organizations to allow donors to contribute and not pay taxes on their contributions.  Non-profit organizations can not be political and back political candidates, so they submit that they are for "causes," not specific politicians. They obviously all have political agendas. ALEC is losing major sponsors and has been lying to the public, the press, and even it's own members. See  PRWatch - Don't Believe The Spin From ALEC and PRWatch - New Guardian Docs Show ALEC Misled Press, Public where a spokesperson for ALEC said they had no intentions of forming a 501c4 in "near future," guess "near future" must mean one week, because 8 days later they formed a 501 c4 be4cause the one they had is under investigation for improprieties. 



The budget bill H. Con. Res. 472 that House Majority Leader Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty (D-WA) Murray agreed on passed the House Thursday, December 12, 2013. Now it must pass the Senate. To pass the Senate all 55 Democrats, and 5 Republicans would have to "Aye" for the bill. Now is the time to CALL YOUR SENATOR.  Use this link GovTrack.us to "Call Congress" (Senator)



Group Bios obtained from Wikipedia

References for Heritage Action (for America)

  1. Jump up ^ May, Caroline (17 June 2010). "Heritage spin-off targets ObamaCare in first grassroots campaign". The Daily Caller. Retrieved 20 January 2011.
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b Rob Christensen (January 11, 2011). "Heritage Foundation sinks its roots in N.C.". The News & Observer. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
  3. Jump up ^ Weber, Joseph. "Hybrid groups using freedom, cash clout; Conservatives purchase ads,start petitions". The Washington Times.
  4. Jump up ^ Fineman, Howard (October 9, 2013). "Heritage Action Bails On Debt Ceiling Fight". The Huffington Post.
  5. Jump up ^ Martin, Jonathan; Rutenberg, Jim; Peters, Jeremy W. (October 19, 2013). "Fiscal Crisis Sounds the Charge in G.O.P.’s ‘Civil War’". The New York Times.
  6. Jump up ^ Hopkins, Christopher Snow; Khan, Naureen (9 October 2010). "People; Interest Groups". The National Journal.
  7. ^ Jump up to: a b Smithwick, Benjamin (5 July 2010). "The Fight to Repeal Obamacare". Human Events.com. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
  8. Jump up ^ Ed Feulner (9 April 2010). "Morning Bell: Heritage Action for America". Morning Bell. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 20 January 2011.
  9. Jump up ^ Gizzi, John (27 August 2010). "Sen. Chuck Hagel Strikes Again". Human Events.com. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
  10. Jump up ^ Arsenault, Mark (11 September 2010). "GOP focus is jobs, not health care; Candidates mostly avoid issue party pledged to hammer". The Boston Globe.
  11. Jump up ^ Budoff-Brown, Carrie (7 January 2011). "Anti-Reform Dems Cool to Repeal Vote". The News & Observer.
  12. Jump up ^ "Right wing group uses fear to fight New START". RT.com. 9 November 2010. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
  13. Jump up ^ Theobald, Bill (12 December 2010). "Corker Faces Political Dilemma on Nuclear Treaty". The Tennessean.
  14. Jump up ^ "Tuesday, July 10,2012". Talkers. July 10, 2012. Retrieved January 15, 2013.
  15. Jump up ^ "Heritage Action for America Launches 'Istook Live!' Radio Show". Entertainment Close-Up. July 13, 2012. Retrieved October 15, 2012.
  16. ^ Jump up to: a b Moody, Chris (October 9, 2013). "Meet one of the conservative advocacy groups behind the GOP's government shutdown strategy". Yahoo! News.
  17. Jump up ^ Joseph, Cameron (October 9, 2013). "Heritage Action leader: Paul Ryan's shutdown offer off-target". The Hill.
  18. Jump up ^ Miller, Zeke J (September 30, 2013). "Hidden Hand: How Heritage Action Drove DC To Shut Down". Time.
  19. Jump up ^ McCormack, John (October 9, 2013). "Heritage Action's Shutdown Strategy". The Weekly Standard.
  20. Jump up ^ Taylor, Jessica (October 17, 2013). "GOP senator: Heritage in danger of not amounting to ‘anything anymore’". MSNBC.
  21. Jump up ^ DeSantis, Ron (14 Feb 2013). "Federal pay freeze bill paves way for reduced spending". The Hill. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  22. Jump up ^ Lunney, Kellie. "House to Vote on Fed Pay Freeze". goveexec.com. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  23. Jump up ^ "H.R. 273 - Congress.gov". United States Congress. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  24. Jump up ^ http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2013/10/more-than-kochs-small-donors-fueled.html
  25. Jump up ^ http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/koch-brothers-heritage-action-donation-98054.html
  26. Jump up ^ http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/koch-brothers-heritage-action-donation-98054.html

References for Club for Growth

  1. Jump up ^ "Our Mission is Economic Freedom". Club for Growth.
  2. Jump up ^ Drew, Elizabeth (3-21-2013). "Are the Republicans Beyond Saving?". New York Review of Books. Retrieved 26 March 2013.
  3. Jump up ^ "About the Club for Growth" www.ClubforGrowth.org
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e O'Connor, Patrick. "Conservative unrest fuels Club fundraising: Toomey". The Hill. Retrieved 4-3-2006.
  5. Jump up ^ Running on empty: how the Democratic and Republican Parties are bankrupting our future By Peter G. Peterson
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Lengell, Sean. "Club for Growth targeting 'establishment' GOP candidates". Washington Times. Retrieved 5-3-2012.
  7. Jump up ^ "Organization Profiles: Club for Growth". OpenSecrets.org. Center for Resonsive Politics. Retrieved 11 April 2013.
  8. ^ Jump up to: a b Catanese, David (5-10-2010). "How Bennett got Clubbed". Politico. Retrieved 23 January 2013.
  9. Jump up ^ Heller, Marc (4-24-2010). "Club for Growth on fence". Watertown Daily Times. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  10. Jump up ^ "Medicare reform The biggest turkey of all?". The Economist. 2003-11-27. Retrieved 13 February 2013.

References for Freedom Works

 

  1. Jump up ^ [1] FreedomWorks. Retrieved: 19 June 2012.
  2. Jump up ^ "SourceWatch Founding".
  3. ^ Jump up to: a b c Clabough, Raven (August 1, 2010). Beck Closely Examines Tea Party Movement. The New American.
  4. Jump up ^ Ed Pilkington, Republicans steal Barack Obama's internet campaigning tricks, The Guardian, September 18, 2009
  5. Jump up ^ Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE) and Empower America Merge to Form FreedomWorks FreedomWorks press release
  6. Jump up ^ Board of Directors, FreedomWorks
  7. Jump up ^ Empower America RightWeb, April 17, 2008
  8. Jump up ^ FreedomWorks Board of Directors
  9. Jump up ^ ‘’Wall Street Journal’’, Citizen Armey, 1/8/2003
  10. Jump up ^ Corn, David; Kroll, Andy (12-3-2012). "Exclusive: Dick Armey Quits Tea Party Group in Split Over Direction". Mother Jones. Retrieved 4 December 2012.
  11. Jump up ^ Gillum, Jack; Braun, Stephen (12-4-2012). "Tea Party group chief quits, cites internal split". Associated Press. Retrieved 4 December 2012.
  12. Jump up ^ FreedomWorks tea party group nearly falls apart in fight between old and new guard
  13. Jump up ^ Marcus, Rachel (4-19-2012). "Tea party leader Dick Armey gets first-class treatment". Huffington Post. Retrieved 4 December 2012.
  14. Jump up ^ CHAIRMAN DICK ARMEY SPEAKS ABOUT THE FALL OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AT THE CATO INSTITUTE
  15. Jump up ^ WISCONSIN CSE IS NOW FREEDOMWORKS
  16. Jump up ^ Freedomworks Issues School Choice
  17. Jump up ^ Freedomworks’ Issues
  18. Jump up ^ Issues: Health Care Reform FreedomWorks. Accessed: 21 June 2012.
  19. Jump up ^ "The Tea Party Movement: Who's In Charge?"
  20. Jump up ^ David Weigel (August 11, 2009). "Conservatives Find Town Hall Strategy in Leftist Text". The Washington Independent. Retrieved 2010-10-31.
  21. ^ Jump up to: a b Shaping Tea Party Passion Into Campaign Force, Kate Zernike, The New York Times, August 25, 2010
  22. Jump up ^ FreedomWorks Says Jump, Tea Partiers Ask How High | TPMMuckraker
  23. Jump up ^ The Lie Machine : Rolling Stone
  24. Jump up ^ Fang, Lee. "Pressed On 
  25. FreedomWorks’ Connections To Tea Parties, Dick Armey Lashes Out At TP As ‘Juvenile Delinquents’". Think Progress. Retrieved 14 March 2012.
  26. Jump up ^ "A Tea-Party Target List? FreedomWorks Releases Its Races For 2010 - Politics - The Atlantic". Politics.theatlantic.com. 2010-01-25. Retrieved 2010-08-29.

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Do-Nothing-Congress Has 4 Days Left - We Have Their Calendar and What's Not On It


Chart by republicanjobnation.com

Where's The Farm Bill, Immigration Bill, Jobs Bill, or Any Significant Legislation That Would Move the Country Forward?

Legislative bills that are normally passed without even a discussion were not passed because they were never even brought onto the floor of the House of Representatives for a vote. The real problem is that the Tea Party members and establishment Republicans can't seem to get anything significant done, House Speaker John Boehner has had to rely on Democratic votes to get bills passed.

A major reason for the lack of legislating, of course, rests in the divided government re-elected in 2012. That left Democrats in control of the Senate and White House, with Republicans in charge of the House.
Sarah Binder, an expert on legislative politics at the Brookings Institute, says that other factors are to blame as well, like policy disputes between members of the same party and the dwindling number of moderates willing to mediate tiffs between warring factions.

Carrie Dann,  a political reporter for NBC News states that the Senate passed comprehensive immigration reform legislation earlier this year but prospects for a vote in the House are slim. House Republicans have voted some 47 times to either repeal or somehow change the newly enacted health-care law, efforts that have been shelved in the upper chamber.

That sets the backdrop for an election year in 2014. With all 435 House seats up for re-election and 33 Senate seats at stake next November, the balance of power in Congress is very much in play. Read More: NBC Politics article about our "Do Nothing Congress" November 26, 2013

With only a handful of remaining legislative days on their calendar, this current Congress is on track to go down as one of the most unproductive in modern history. The paltry number of bills Congress has passed into law this year paints a vivid picture of just how bad the gridlock has been for lawmakers, whose single-digit approval rating illustrates that the public is hardly satisfied with their trickle of legislative activity.

According to THOMAS, the legislative tracking service, this Congress has passed just 52 public laws since it gaveled into session in January. Check the

 At this point in George W. Bush’s second term as president, for example, 113 bills had been enacted into law, according to numbers crunched by Pew Research Center’s Drew DeSilver. In the same amount of time during the 110th Congress – from January until before the Thanksgiving recess of 2007 – that number was 120.

So far this year, the president has signed legislation to specify the size of commemorative coins for the Baseball Hall of Fame, to name a subsection of IRS code after former Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison and to honor baseball great Stan Musial with a namesake Midwestern bridge.
With the ceremonial measures excluded, according to DeSilver’s calculations, Congress has enacted just 44 “substantive” laws so far this year. That’s well below the average of about 70 substantive bills passed in the equivalent time period between 1999 and 2012.


Photo by Eric Wolfson

U.S. House of Representatives John Boehner (R-OH)

 Many in Washington say Boehner is to blame for his woes. Others say the fractious nature of the current Republican caucus might have undermined any speaker. Newt Gingrich, who held the post in the mid-1990s, says that Democrats’ control of the Senate and the White House has made Boehner’s job “10 times harder than mine was.” Boehner still plays a key role in Congress, but primarily by refusing to allow votes on measures supported by the Senate, like its immigration reform bill, which Democrats say would  pass if it came to the floor. In fact, in a strange twist on bipartisanship, most of the must-pass measures adopted by Congress recently have gotten through the House only when Boehner has defied the wishes of a majority of his caucus and relied on Democrats. Those votes have been widely described as a sign of weakness. If that is so, that may be evidence that the problem isn’t purely Boehner’s own. His Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, turned to Republicans seven times for votes she couldn’t get from her own side.


Paul Ryan (R) and Patty Murray (D) working on budget deal.  Photo by navytimes.com

 Obama vs. Boehner: Who Killed the Debt Deal?

In a New York Times Magazine Article in March, 2012 - Who Killed The Debt Deal?  Almost immediately after the so-called grand bargain between President Obama and the Republican speaker of the house, John Boehner, unraveled last July, the two sides quickly settled into dueling, self-serving narratives of what transpired behind closed doors. In the months that followed, some of Washington’s most connected Democrats and Republicans told me in casual conversations that they didn’t know whose story to believe, or even what, exactly, had been on the table during the negotiations. Both sides knew that if the most crucial and contested details of their deliberations became public, it would complicate relationships with some of their most important constituencies in Washington — or worse. It’s one thing for a Democratic president to embrace painful cuts in Medicare and Social Security benefits, or for a Republican speaker to contemplate raising taxes, if they can ultimately claim that they’ve joined together to make the hard decisions necessary for the country; it’s quite another thing to shatter the trust of your most ideological allies and come away with nothing to show for it. Obama and Boehner have clung to their separate realities not just because it’s useful to blame each other for the political dysfunction in Washington, but because neither wants to talk about just how far he was willing to go.


Photo by jobsanger.blogspot.com

December is for Deadline on Budget Deal:


December 13, 2013 is when House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R) and Senate Budget Committee Chair Patty Murray (D) are supposed to produce the compromise conference report on the budget negotiations; By the way, congressional appropriators are very itchy to get at least a topline number from Ryan-Murray to find out if Sequester 2 is really going to kick in.

Democrats are resisting a proposal to increase the amount federal employees contribute to their pensions, while Republicans are challenging the concept of trading spending cuts for promises of future savings. Democrats are also demanding an extension of benefits for long-term unemployment insurance, either as part budget deal or as a separate measure.

In case a budget deal isn’t reached, House lawmakers yesterday began discussing the outline of a short-term bill to fund the government, according to a Republican leadership aide. The bill would probably be for three months, after current authority expires Jan. 15. Read More: Bloomberg December 6, 2013 Budget Negotiators Seek Limited Deal as Opposition Mounts


Photo by obamacrat.com

What America Needs as Opposed to What Political Parties Need  

President Barack Obama Address on December 4, 2013  focused on his plan to grow the economy and the middle class. The unemployment numbers that came out on Friday were encouraging, 7%, the lowest in 5 years, since the financial crisis. This country needs significant legislation on many issues, the Farm bill (without $40B taken out of food stamps like the Republican Congress want,) Immigration Reform, Jobs, Women's Rights legislation, that stops the attack on women, Voter ID/disenfranchise laws stopped,  it does not need the obstructionism, partisanship politics, misleading rhetoric and outright lies, selfishness, corrupt politicians, Tea Party members backed by the ultra-rich, corporations, and Super PACS (that are buying our elections and Representatives.) The TeaPublican/Republican Party needs to get those who treat the word "compromise" as a word that doesn't exist in the English language out of their elected offices. That's harder to do since the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Citizens United. That's why we need a Constitutional Amendment to overturn that decision. The parties need to work together to solve issues and stop the racist, hateful, and obstructionism that just doesn't make any sense for anyone.



How Income Inequality is Holding Back Our Economy

In a Center for American Progress December 4, 2013 Article Ben Olinsky and Asher Mayerson explain how "Trickle Down Economics" didn't, and don't work. "For more than 30 years, conservative politicians have tried to sell Americans on the notion that giving tax cuts to the wealthy will spur economic growth and job creation, generating broad-based economic prosperity. Their marketing of this “trickle-down economics” has been successful: After decades of campaigning, many Americans now accept the oft-repeated assertion that lower taxes and less regulation leads to job growth. Congress followed suit, lowering tax rates sharply for the highest-income earners, while leaving tax rates relatively unchanged for other groups. When President Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, the marginal tax rate for the highest income bracket was 70 percent, but that fell to just 28 percent by the time he left office. Even after modest increases since then, the top marginal tax rate for top earners today hovers at just more than half of what it was in 1980 (see figure 1). At the same time, Congress and the courts have taken repeated steps to roll back labor and financial regulation, further contributing to the skyrocketing wealth of the top 1 percent."

Jared Bernstein explains the "Impact of Income Equality" in a Center for American Progress Article on "The Impact of Income Inequality on Growth" He says  "Among the most important economic challenges facing the United States and some other advanced economies today is the increase in the inequality of economic outcomes. In the case of the United States, the distributions of income, wages, and wealth are more dispersed than ever. Though measurement issues abound, it is widely agreed that U.S. economic inequality is at historically high levels."

Jobs

The  U.S. created 203,000 jobs and the unemployment rate falls to 7%, that's good news. It's the lowest it has been since the financial crisis occurred in 2009. In a Huffington Post December 6, 2013 article on the November Jobs Report the Associated Press "A fourth straight month of solid hiring cut the U.S. unemployment rate in November to a five-year low of 7 percent. The gains in the job market could spur greater economic growth." We need a jobs bill passed, infrastructure repair and replacement, and training to put people back to work who lost their jobs through no fault of their own and are not good candidates for the jobs that are available.much of our infrastructure is in dire need of repair, the amount of bridges that hundreds of thousands of American families drive over daily, that have failed inspections is unbelievable in a country like ours. Pass a damn jobs bill and let's get the infrastructure repair5s and replacement underway.



Photo by iowarepublican.com

Immigration Reform

 In a Washington Post Opinion on December 6, 2013 famed Chef Jose Andres said  "The first time I saw America was from my perch on the mast of a Spanish naval ship, where I could spot the Statue of Liberty reaching proudly into the open, endless American sky. At night, I would often wonder whether that sky was the explanation for the stars on the American flag — put there so the world would know that this is a place of limitless possibility, where anyone from anywhere can strive for a better life."

 He recalled that starry sky on Nov. 13, when after 23 years in America, my wife, Patricia, and I were sworn in as United States citizens. The naturalization ceremony in Baltimore, attended by 72 other tearful immigrants from 35 countries, was a moment I had dreamed about since the day I arrived in America with little more than $50 and a set of cooking knives, determined to belong. I eventually settled in Washington, where my partners and I have been fortunate to build a restaurant business that now employs thousands of Americans across the country.

Because many of us took great risks to come here and support our families, immigrants tend to have an especially strong work ethic. My friend Rodolfo started his career in America tiling the floors at Jaleo, our first restaurant. But he soon began washing dishes and baking bread overnight, sometimes holding two or three jobs while he learned how to cook. And today, that construction worker from Bolivia is a head chef, a restaurant investor, a wonderful father and a proud American citizen.


If other immigrants had the chance to pursue their dreams like Rodolfo, all of America would benefit. As legal residents, immigrants would contribute more in taxes, spend more at our businesses, start companies of their own and create more jobs. Immigration is not a problem for us to solve but an opportunity for America to seize.

Right now the legislation is stalled in the do-nothing-Congress. The Senate bill S 744, the "Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act" introduced to the Senate on April 16, 2013, by Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) passed the Senate on July 27, 2013. In the U.S. House of Representatives there numerous bills related to the Senate bill; 

H.R. 3568: Training Highly Skilled Americans Act of 2013 







 

Comprehensive Immigration Reform Stalled

House Speaker John Boehner refuses to bring a comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill, like the Senate's S 744 to the floor for a vote. Senate Majority has said for some time that there are enough votes with House Democrats and Republicans to pass a bipartisan bill. But, there it sits, stalled. 

Photo  by politusic.com

We Must Fire These Representatives Who Are Not Representing the American People's Best Interests  


If you check the Bills To Be Considered in the U.S. House of Representatives for the Week of December 9, 2013 you won't see a Farm Bill, an Immigration Reform Bill, a Jobs Bill, or much of anything significant. 

Just as many important issues have not been acted upon by this Do-Nothing-Congress, about to become the "Least Productive Congress Ever" in the Guinness World Book of Records. Talk to friends, neighbors, co-workers, staying with these obstructionist TeaPublican, Republicans is hurting our Republic. The turnout for the 2014 elections will probably determine who controls the House and the Senate after the midterm elections. Typically the incumbent President loses seats in the House during his second term especially. We must not let that happen, for the good of the country.

Saturday, December 7, 2013

New Guardian Docs Show ALEC Misled Press, Public. Are You Surprised?

Are Your Representatives ALEC Members? 

 
Photo by DailyKos

Are Your Representatives Members of ALEC? What Is ALEC?

The Center For Media and Democracy Article: ALEC Exposed  tells how global corporations are scheming to rewrite YOUR rights and boost THEIR revenues. In this posting you can also see "Who Is Behind ALEC?" "Who Funds ALEC?" "What Corporations Are Involved In ALEC?" Through the corporate-funded American Legislative Exchange Council, global corporations and state politicians vote behind closed doors to try to rewrite state laws that govern your rights. In ALEC's own words; "corporations have a voice, and vote." Regardless of what ALEC members say, the U.S. Constitution does NOT give corporations the same rights as people, and money is NOT a voice. Corporations do NOT have the right to vote.


Cartoon by articpetrel.blogspot.com

Citizens United Gives Corporations Power Through Campaign Contributions

Although a Peter Hart poll found that 79% of Americans including 68% of Republicans, 82% of Independents, and 87% of Democrats "support a Constitutional Amendment that would overturn then Citizens United decision and make clear that corporations do not have the same rights as people. Further, a 2012 Associated Press poll  found that 83% of Americans including 81% of Republicans, 78% of Independents, and 85% of Democrats believe "there should be limits on the amount of money corporations, unions, and other organizations can contribute to outside organizations trying to influence campaigns for President, Senate, and the U.S. House of Representatives. Nearly nine in ten Americans (88%) say that corporations have too much power. 83% of Americans (81% of Republicans, 78% of Independents, and 85% of Democrats) think there should be limits on how much money corporations can give in elections. And 90% of those with incomes above $100,000 support such limits.


More From The Guardian Documents

ALEC forms 501(c)(4), but previously claimed: "We have no current plans to operate a 501(c)(4) in the near future"

The Guardian documents show that ALEC has formed a new 501(c)(4) entity, the "Jeffersonian Project," apparently in anticipation of the IRS investigating ALEC's current 501(c)(3) charitable status. This revelation could be seen as an admission from ALEC that its critics were correct about its violations of the tax code (although ALEC insists it does not lobby, despite documentary evidence to the contrary).
ALEC had previously misled reporters about its plans for a 501(c)(4).

In December of last year, ALEC spokesperson Kaitlyn Buss told Bloomberg News "we have no current plans to operate a 501(c)(4) in the near future."
When Buss said "the near future" and "current plans," she apparently meant "next week."
Just eight days after the Bloomberg story ran, ALEC formed the 501(c)(4) "Jeffersonian Project," according to a certificate of incorporation obtained by the Center for Media and Democracy. (ALEC also failed to mention to Bloomberg that it had incorporated another 501(c)(4), "ALEC NOW" in July of 2012; that entity was dissolved earlier this year.)

To learn more about ALEC and who is involved see a post from this blog on September 1, 2013

When Common Cause's late president Bob Edgar filed a whistleblower complaint challenging ALEC's tax status in April of 2012, ALEC fought back hard. Its lawyer Alan Dye publicly dismissed the complaint a "harassment tactic" that "ignores applicable law."
"The attacks on the American Legislative Exchange Council are based on patently false claims," he told reporters at the time.

But behind the scenes, Dye took a more measured tone, according to the Guardian documents. Forming a 501(c)(4) -- which is allowed to lobby without limit -- would "provide greater legal protection or lessen ethics concerns," Dye wrote in an August 2013 memo to ALEC's board of directors. Forming the Jeffersonian Project would remove "questions of ethical violations made by our critics and state ethics boards and provides further legal protection."

"ALEC certified to the IRS for years that it didn't spend a penny on lobbying, thereby preserving its absurd status as a charity," Steve Spaulding, Staff Counsel at Common Cause, told the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD.)
ALEC's charitable status had allowed its corporate members to write-off their ALEC membership dues -- which are essentially lobbying expenses -- as tax-deductible charitable contributions.
"In forming a 501(c)(4) arm, it appears that ALEC is on notice that it's not going to get away with abusing our nation's charitable tax laws much longer," Spaulding said.

Read More on The Center for Media and Democracies PR Watch

Be sure to "Subscribe" to this blog (above on the left margin) and "Sign Up for E-mails for notifications of laws being acted upon in the House and Senate. The U.S. House of Representatives only has 4 days left before the end of the year. Stay informed and contact YOUR Representatives on bills they are preparing to act on.

Photo by PR Watch.org
Also see The Center for Media and Democracy's article Don't Believe the Spin from ALEC telling how ALEC members will gather legislators to plan their agenda for next year.

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Medicare Part D - Joe Scarborough Doesn't Remember "All These Problems"

 Medicare Part D - It's Problems - It's Rollout Similarities to the Affordable Care Act

by Kaiser Family Foundation




It bothered my when Joe Scarborough said he didn't remember "all these problems" with the Prescription Drug Plan bill back when President George W. Bush and the Republicans pushed through what some call the "worst legislation passed since the 1960's. At about 6:20 AM  this morning on his show, Joe Scarborough said "the only thing I remember is that they (the Republicans) held the vote open for 3 weeks and then bribed Nick Smith for his vote. He should use his current health plan to look into what pharmaceuticals are available for a bad memory. I sent an e-mail off to the show immediately, here's a copy of the text:
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"First let me say that I love Morning Joe and you all help me start my day, everyday. I've been watching for years and depend on the show to start my day and gather information before I work on my blog www.Medic3569.blogspot.com which I use to inform and motivate people to become well informed and especially to contact Congressmen/women and Senators.

At approximately 6:20 AM Joe Scarborough said he didn't remember "all these problems with Medicare Part D."  What I remember about the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act is that the vote was held open until like 3:00 AM while Republicans twisted arms of other Republicans to vote for the bill. The party threatened Republicans to not back them in their next election if they didn't vote for the bill. I remember that it took away the right to negotiate price (except for the Veterans Administration who was smart enough to stay out of it) and the price Medicare would pay for a common heart went from $280 annually to over $1200 annually.
On December 8, 2003 these provisions of the law passed the Congress by a narrow margin:
  • it provides a subsidy for large employers to discourage them from eliminating private prescription coverage to retired workers (a key AARP goal.)
  • it prohibits the Federal government from negotiating discounts with drug companies;
  • it prevents the government from establishing a formulary , though does not prevent private providers such as HMO's from doing so.
It's the second one I have a problem with, especially since the Republicans and George W. Bush offered no way whatsoever of paying for it!
Later, after the hugh windfall that drug companies enjoyed, I believe it was 60 Minutes who reported, 23-25 of the politicians that co-sponsored the bill had left their jobs in the Congress by either not running for re-election or, in at least one case, just resigned their position, and went to work for pharmaceutical companies at salaries well north of $1M a year.
Joe Scarborough doesn't remember any problems with the bill except for one Congressman that the Republicans were pressuring to change his vote, perhaps he should look into what prescriptions are available for senility."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Photo by crooksandliars.com

Here are Some of the Problems Medicare Part D had on Rollout

For one thing, the Bush administration faced a difficult political battle to get the bill passed in 2003. I remember they had to hold the vote open until 3:00 AM while they twisted the Republicans arms to vote for the bill. Joe Scarborough said they actually held the vote open for three weeks, I don't know about that.

That damaged public opinion of the law, making it a challenge to educate 43 million seniors on its nuances.

Enrollment in the law was set to begin in late 2005. In April of that year, a Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that only 27 percent of respondents understood the law, while only 21 percent favored it. (In a comparable Kaiser poll in April 2013, 35 percent viewed the Affordable Care Act favorably and less than half felt they were well-informed of its details.)

The Medicare site, meant to help seniors pick benefit plans, was supposed to debut Oct. 13, 2005, but it didn’t go live until weeks later in November. Even then, "the tool itself appeared to be in need of fixing," the Washington Post reported at this time.

From PolitiFact - Did Medicare Part D have the same rollout problems as the Obamacare online marketplaces? :

"Visitors to the site could not access it for most of the first two hours. When it finally did come up around 5 p.m., it operated awfully slowly," the Post reported. (Sensing a pattern?)

Once seniors began to enroll, problems persisted. According to the report, the online tools had "accuracy problems," and local organizations designated with assisting seniors "reported problems getting necessary and accurate information." Call centers provided by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services underestimated "the needed capacity to ensure that reliable answers could be provided" and "service representatives were not knowledgeable or failed to provide accurate information."

The Georgetown experts anticipated similar hiccups with the Affordable Care Act, noting that the country’s experience with Medicare Part D suggested "the experience will be far from perfect" and "problems were not always addressed as quickly or as thoroughly as critics would have liked, but fixes were usually found."
These days, nine in 10 seniors who utilize the program report they are satisfied with it.
"There’s really a striking amount of similarity even though this time it’s a far larger and daunting task. It’s a fair comparison," said Jack Hoadley at the Georgetown University's Health Policy Institute and one of the authors of the study. "Once something works its way through the problems, you forget the problems."

Approximately twp weeks before the bill passed and the Bush administration was saying the law would cost about $100M, but it was revealed that the plan would cost at least $500M, it turned out to cost much, much, more.

Photo by econbroswer.com


 In a story by Nick Gillespie at Reason.com on November 19, 2013:

         According to the latest actuaries’ report, Medicare Part D will cost taxpayers - beneficiaries pay virtually nothing -    Part D will cost taxpayers — beneficiaries pay virtually nothing — $62 billion this year. This figure is expected to rise sharply in coming years to $150 billion in 2019. By 2030, Part D alone will cost taxpayers 1 percent of GDP. In present value terms, Medicare Part D adds almost $16 trillion to our national indebtedness. (That's how much would need to be in a trust fund today to pay all the benefits that have been promised over and above the trivial premiums paid by beneficiaries.) That is why former U.S. Comptroller David Walker has called the unfunded prescription drug benefit "the most fiscally irresponsible piece of legislation since the 1960's."  Read more at Reason.com


Photo by blog.floridablue.com

Where Does The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) Go From Here?

After spending more than $60M on 46 votes to repeal Obamacare the Republicans still have never offered any other plan to help insure the 40 million Americans who didn't have, and couldn't afford health insurance. Mitt Romney, the Republican, who when he was Governor of Massachusetts passed the health law that Obamacare is designed after. They would like to forget how much insurance premiums were rising and that since the Affordable Care Act was signed into law that the rate of increases has been reduced. The Republicans complain about "millions of policies being cancelled" but choose to not respond to where they were when millions of people who paid health insurance premiums for years had their policies cancelled once they became ill. The TeaPublican Republicans have no response about positive things that the Affordable Care Act have done like; allowing children to stay on their parents policies until the age of 26; or that insurance companies now have to spend at least 80% of the money they collect from premiums on the policy holders instead of giving themselves hugh salaries and bonuses; or how 40 million Americans who only had emergency rooms to use as their only access to healthcare, the most expensive way to pay for someone's healthcare will now have healthcare plans and preventive medicine. What  we all need to do is work to fix the problems with The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as they arise and get everyone affordable healthcare.