Showing posts with label House Republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House Republicans. Show all posts

Friday, November 29, 2013

74% Oppose H.R. 1755 (S 815 PASSED) The Employment Discrimination Act - ACT NOW - Bill is to be Acted Upon During Last Days of Session

 Status and Opinion on the Bills That Will Be Dealt With In The Last Days Before Holiday Recess

Photo by blackenterprise.com
Photo by libguides.law.drake.edu












74% of People "Oppose" H.R. 1755 (Related Bill - S 815 -Passed the Senate on November 7, 2013) The "Non-Discrimination Act, Wait! What?! 

74% Oppose H.R. 1755 POPVOX Page for H.R. 1755 , how could that be? There are 200 Co-Sponsors of this bill List of Co-Sponsors of H.R. 1755 on Congress.gov. It was Referred to the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections on July 8, 2013 by Rep. Jared Polis [D, CO-2] yet if you check with the  POPVOX Bill Report you'll see out of the 282 constituents that responded 74% oppose the bill. Organizations that endorse the bill include: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the American Humanist Association, the Coalition of Labor Union Women (CLUW), and the Human Rights Campaign. There are no organizations on POPVOX that oppose the bill. So where are these 74% of constituents that oppose this bill coming from?

Opposing Comments

If you look at some of the comments (click or tap the top link "POPVOX Page...") you'll see things like: "It endangers religious freedom and creates unnecessary restrictions on business owners," from jared_quirk1 in Pennsylvania's 3rd District and, from CraigBabich in Virginia's 7th District "Let us not continue to tie the hands of small business in America." How does not allowing employer discrimination based on "the basis of actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity" tie the hands of an employer? And finally on the opposing comments oldsquid from Arizona's 1st District "This would force faith based organizations to hire persons that blatantly oppose the very tenants of faith in Almighty God, by their actions, lifestyle, etc." what happened to "Love thy Neighbor" and "treat your worst enemy as you would treat your brother?" Is someone of the LBGT community even an enemy? Is oldsquid judging?

Comments from those that Endorse H.R. 1755

LivSimply in Maryland's 4th District "No one should be denied a job based on their sexual preference or gender identity. This is an issue of basic human dignity and sex discrimination," but is this bill forcing employers to hire people in fear they will be sued? WiseOldUnicorn in Georgia's 2nd District says "If it's wrong to discriminate against people because of things like religion, sex, or age, then it's also wrong to discriminate against them because of sexuality or gender identity." Although you can't "choose" you age you can choose what religion you choose to follow, For those who don't know, people don't "choose" to be gay, wake-up. Unlike Michelle Bachman's Husband who claimed to be able to "Pray the Gay Away," people have come to realize certain things about people's sexual orientation. JudHanson in Arkansas's 3rd District  says "The First Amendment does not grant people the right to use their faith to rob others of their dignity and basic civil rights," and "Discrimination of any kind in the workplace is wrong and should not be allowed." JudHanson is right, there is no such right in the First Amendment.

 

Discrimination in the Workplace is Wrong - Now is the Time To Speak Out

Whether the discrimination is based on age, ethnicity, sex, or sexual orientation, it is wrong. Just as hatred and racism are. As far as employers being sued for not hiring people based on their sexual orientation, that's simple, just hire the best candidate for the job based on experience and merit, not on sexual orientation and they won't be guilty of discrimination. By using this hiring practice business owners will benefit, not be involved in frivolous law suits. People need to become informed. Yesterday I saw a survey by Human Health Services (HHS) that said 27% of people still believe you can be infected with HIV from casual contact (shaking hands) with people infected with the virus. Really? Really? I taught "Communicable and Infectious Diseases" to EMT's and Paramedics in New York City EMS in 1985, then, we weren't sure of which routes of transmission would transmit the virus, but folks, that was 1985! And yet after decades of scientific research which proves beyond any reasonable doubt that it is a bloodbourne disease 27% of people are ignorant to these facts, as well as those of sexual orientation.

S 815 passed the Senate on November 7 2013, and the bill in the House of Representatives, H.R. 1755 needs to pass. You can help! "Click," or "Tap" on this link www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1755 and click or t6ap on "Call Congress," it will find your Congressmen/women and place the call for you, it even has a script to read from, if you'd like, for when they connect you. But DON'T WAIT, time is running out quickly!

 





Saturday, November 16, 2013

THE DEFECTORS of HR 3350, Republicans concerned over Health Insurance Plans being Cancelled, Really?!

Did Your Congressman Defect? What Will Your Senators Do?


I thank Mike Allen of  Politico for listing THE DEFECTORS - of HR 3350 "Thirty-nine House Democrats, many from competitive districts, joined Republicans in voting for the 'Keep Your Health Plan' act sponsored by Energy and Commerce chairman Fred Upton [passed 261-157, over Obama veto threat ] ... Ron Barber (Ariz.), John Barrow (Ga.), Ami Bera (Calif.), Tim Bishop (N.Y.), Bruce Braley (Iowa), Julia Brownley (Calif.), Cheri Bustos (Ill.), Jim Costa (Calif.), Peter DeFazio (Ore.), Suzan DelBene (Wash.), Tammy Duckworth (Ill.), Bill Enyart (Ill.), Elizabeth Esty (Conn.), Bill Foster (Ill.), Pete Gallego (Texas), John Garamendi (Calif.), Joe Garcia (Fla.), Ron Kind (Wis.), Ann McLane Kuster (N.H.), Dave Loebsack (Iowa)., Dan Maffei (N.Y.), Sean Patrick Maloney (N.Y.), Jim Matheson (Utah), Mike McIntyre (N.C.), Jerry McNerney (Calif.), Patrick Murphy (FL), Rick Nolan (Minn.), Bill Owens (N.Y.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Scott Peters (Calif.), Collin Peterson (Minn.), Nick Rahall (W. Va.), Raul Ruiz (Calif.), Brad Schneider (Ill.), Kurt Schrader (Ore.), Carol Shea-Porter (N.H.), Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.), Filemon Vela (Texas), Tim Walz (Minn.)."

I was extremely disappointed to see my Congressman's name as one of the defectors. I have sent a letter to my Congressman explaining my disappointment and asking for his view. I also sent the letter to my Senators asking what their intentions are once the bill gets to the Senate. Letter sent to Congressman Bishop and Senators Schumer and Gillibrand

"Why Republicans Suddenly Care About Cancelled Health Policies"


"Why Republicans Suddenly Care About Cancelled Health Policies" Nation of Change Article reminds us that until insurance cancellations became a political embarrassment for President Barack Obama, the usual right-wing reaction was silence. (Except for that awkward and revealing outburst during the 2012 Republican debates when a live audience howled its approval for the "let him die" plan.) What is the Republicans plan? No one did nothing for decades about the healthcare crisis. What do the Republicans have to help the 40 million people on this country who couldn't afford healthcare. And many people seem to forget how much the cost of health insurance was going up every year before the Affordable Care Act slowed the increases in the cost of insurance. The fact that insurance companies will need to spend 85% of the money they receive from premiums on actual benefits for the policy holders caused people to get refund checks from insurance companies, many of those people probably didn't realize why they got those checks. People who are not losing their policies because they got sick should know that they only still have their policy because of the affordable Care Act. And those people getting cancellation letters should look at the policies they had and realize just what they covered, and the fact that they would have been cancelled the minute they got sick anyway, only they would of continued to pay the premiums as long as they stayed healthy and didn't make claims on the policy.

Monday, October 14, 2013

What Will Happen If We Actually Default, and Possibly Even Before The Deadline?

Photo by money.cnn.com

 What Will Happen If We Actually Default, and Possibly Even Before The Deadline?

  • Significantly increased interest costs on the national debt
  • Long-term negative impacts for the U.S. economy
  • Real, tangible, and costly consequences for everyday Americans
  • Severe, unpredictable consequences for the U.S. and the world financial system
  • Macroeconomic consequences that increase with each day the debt ceiling restrains activity
  • An immense amount of unpredictable downside risk to the U.S. economy
 The Center For American Progress lists the above items as what will happen if our legislators don't lift the debt ceiling in a timely manner. Actually, we can learn from the past and realize that we may not even have to hit the deadline before damage is done. When Standard and Poor's downgraded the U. S. credit rating in August 2011it said “the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened.” An increase in the interest premium paid on the federal debt of between 0.1 percentage points and 0.5 percentage points would cost taxpayers between $120 billion and $600 billion over the next 10 years.

See the Entire Center For American Progress article at www.americanprogress.org/issues/budget/report/2013/10/10/76713/what-should-we-expect-if-the-united-states-defaults-2/

 Virtually every kind of credit used by middle-class Americans—from credit cards to student, auto, and home loans—is connected to interest rates on Treasuries. Typically, the issuers of these credit products make their profits by charging an additional interest spread on top of Treasury rates, so an increase in the interest rate on Treasuries alone will drive up borrowing costs.

 Increased credit costs would have a significant direct effect on the recovery, even in the case of a very short-term default. As investors demand a larger risk premium on Treasuries, this cost will be passed through to financing costs in the housing and auto sectors. After struggling over the past few years, these sectors have recently regained steam and have begun to lead the recovery. Due in part to favorable lending conditions and pent-up demand, auto sales are on pace for their best year since 2007.

 None of these costs are trivial, especially at this fragile moment in the economic recovery. Default will carry long-lived increases in the risk premium paid on Treasury bonds, which filter through to every type of borrowing and banking done by Main Street America. Increased volatility in asset prices and decreases in consumer and business confidence as well as household wealth are harmful to an economy at any point; given the current state of the recovery, even these consequences—which are the least severe and most easily understood ones of a temporary default—will impose real, significant costs on average Americans.

 If the American economy were a typical one, a default would go something like this: Investors would get spooked, pull capital out of U.S. stocks and bonds, take losses, and move their money to safer assets in other countries. Back in the United States, interest rates would rise and asset prices and the U.S. dollar would fall. Imports would become more expensive and inflation would rise. Gross domestic product, or GDP, and employment would fall. A default would be catastrophic, but in an utterly predictable way. Over time, the fall in the value of the dollar would make U.S. manufacturing and exports more competitive, leading the economy out of a deep recession and bringing the country back to reasonable conditions after a mere lost decade or two.
 
 In part, in the conclusion of the article, Michael Madowitz an Economist at the Center for American Progress states that the United States has already been through one financial crisis, which taught us valuable lessons about the financial system. Legislators would be wise to consider those lessons now. The day-to-day U.S. economy is more reliant on a well-functioning financial system than previously thought, and there is a much clearer picture of how destabilizing financial market turmoil is to the real economy. The system is also less stable and less well understood than previously assumed—an especially important lesson for legislators who are proceeding as if they can use the U.S. economy as a bargaining chip in an unrelated, entirely political disagreement.
Political considerations aside, it is all but inconceivable that Congress would be irresponsible enough to not lift the debt ceiling. This belief is likely responsible for the lack of market movement against U.S. Treasuries so far, but the lack of movement underscores how destabilizing it could be if Congress fails to lift the debt ceiling before it affects the global financial system and American families.

It's time that you spoke up. Contact YOUR Congressmen/women and Senators and tell them to STOP playing politics and do the work that they were elected to do. We're OUT OF TIME!

Find and contact YOUR Congressmen/women by using this link where all you need is your zip code:
http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/ At this site it is very easy to find who your Congressmen/women are AND to send them an e-mail.

Find and contact YOUR Senators (2) by using this link where all you need is your zip code:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm  At this site it is very easy to find who your Senators are AND to send them an e-mail.