Sunday, January 26, 2014

Can Congress Force the Presidents Hand on the Keystone XL Pipeline? Should They?

Dirty Alberta Tar Sands Oil - Photo by: corpethics.org
Dirty Alberta Tar Sands Oil - Photo by: corpethics.org
 Can Congress overrule Obama on the Keystone XL pipeline? {Hope NOT!} The State Department is in the midst of an extensive environmental and national interest review of the pipeline, which supporters say will help meet America’s energy and economic needs, and which opponents say will accelerate climate change. Read more of the Washington Post article by Juliet Eilperin, "Can Congress Overrule Obama on the Keystone XL Pipeline?"

 "Supporters say will help meet America’s energy and economic needs," THAT'S A LIE! The fact is that NONE of the tar sands crude will be used in America at all. The crude to go through the pipeline to the Gulf is going to be shipped to China and other nations. The refinery is owned by Shell Oil and a Saudi Arabian oil company. As far as our economic needs, it has been proven that the pipeline will cause gas prices to go up 25 to 40 cents per gallon at the pump. As far as jobs where as supporters originally said the pipeline would create "tens of thousands of jobs," which they have backed down from, the pipeline will create approximately 2,000-4,000 construction jobs while it is being built, but once operational will only create about 50 permanent jobs.

 In an article written by Brendan Smith for Labor Network for Sustainability 5 Reasons Why the Keystone Pipeline is Bad for the Economy   After a year of extreme weather — at an extreme cost to the economy — this age old jobs vs. environment debate is emerging as a false choice. Hurricanes, floods, and droughts are already having a devastating effect on American jobs, and that is nothing compared to what will happen if we throw open the spigot to the tar sands from Canada, considered the dirtiest oil in the world.
Here are 5 reasons why building the Keystone pipeline is bad for the economy — and workers:

1. Building the Keystone pipeline and opening up the Tar Sands will negatively impact national and local economies: Burning the recoverable tar sands oil will increase the earth’s temperature by a minimum of 2 degree Celsius, which NYU Law School’s Environmental Law Center estimates could permanently cut the US GDP by 2.5%.

2. The same fossil fuel interests pushing the Keystone pipeline have been cutting, not creating, jobs: Despite generating $546 billion in profits between 2005 and 2010, ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP reduced their U.S. workforce by 11,200 employees over that period. In 2010 alone, the top five oil companies slashed their global workforce by 4,400 employees — the same year executives paid themselves nearly $220 million. But at least those working in the industry as a whole get paid high wages, right? Turns out that 40 percent of U.S oil-industry jobs consist of minimum-wage work at gas stations. Instead of bankrolling an industry that is laying off workers and threatening our economic future, isn’t it time to take the billions in subsidies going to oil companies and invest instead in a sector that both creates jobs and protects the planet?

3. Unemployment will rise: According to Mark Zandi, the Chief Economist of Moody’s Analytics: “Superstorm Sandy wreaked havoc on the job market in November, slicing an estimated 86,000 jobs from payrolls.” In the wake of Hurricane Irene, the number of workers filing unemployment claims in Vermont went from 731 before Irene to 1,331 two weeks afterwards. Hurricane Katrina wiped out 129,000 jobs in the New Orleans region — nearly 20 percent. For the U.S. economy as a whole, 2011 cost US taxpayers $52 billion.

4. Poor and working people will be disproportionately affected: KXL and projects like it result in disproportionately negative impact on already struggling working families. According to a recent report by the Center for American Progress called “Heavy Weather: How Climate Destruction Harms Middle- and Lower-Income Americans, lower-and middle income households are disproportionately affected by the most expensive extreme weather events. Sixteen states were afflicted by five or more extreme weather events in 2011-12. Households in disaster-declared counties in these states earn $48,137, or seven percent below the U.S. median income.

5. Building the sustainable economy, not the Keystone pipeline, will create far more jobs: Our nation is in desperate need of jobs. Approving the Keystone pipeline locks our nation into a trajectory of guaranteed job loss and threatens the stability of the US economy. Why keep the “job-killing” course, when the alternative-energy path is already out-performing other sectors of the economy. For example, the solar industry continues to be an engine of job growth — creating jobs six times faster than the overall job market. Research by the Solar Foundation shows a 13 percent growth in high-skilled solar jobs spanning installations, sales, marketing, manufacturing and software development — bringing total direct jobs to 119,000 in the sector. And according to the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts–Amherst, investment in a green infrastructure program would create nearly four times as many jobs as an equal investment in oil and gas.

 You may remember that when Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney spoke of the 47% that would never vote for him, he referred to them as "takers." The 1% has consistently referred to themselves as "Job Creators," which just doesn't pan out and has been disproved.

“If you want to create jobs, cut taxes on the people who create jobs.” This plausible-sounding policy proposal, which translates politically into lowering marginal tax rates on high earners, has generated massive discussion. Forbes - June 2013 - Who are the Real Job Creators.
Bottom Line
 I am all in favor of government doing less, spending less, and extracting less from the citizenry in taxes. There may be sound rationales for skewing the tax cuts that emerge from such reforms toward the highest earners. Attempting to foster long-term job creation in the economy at large is not one of them.
 People like Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney and other members of the 1% often portrayed themselves as "Job Creators," and take credit for creating the best economy in the world. They pretend that they have superior knowledge, and through their own hard work, they have risen above the rest of the us in America in terms of economic wealth and political power. Well the political power part is true, mainly because of the U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Citizens United decision, which allowed unlimited campaign contributions from corporations, without even disclosing the donor. They claim to be held back by the fact that so many of their fellow citizens are "moochers" and expect a free ride and a free lunch at their expense. The Bush tax cuts were in place for 10 years and when Bush left office we were losing 700,000 jobs a month.
 The Keystone XL pipeline will carry the dirtiest fuels in the world, tar sands oil. TransCanada wants to build the northern section of the pipeline but needs approval of the President because it crosses an international border. The Keystone XL pipeline, if built, will stretch 2,000 miles from Alberta Canada to the Gulf Coast of the United States. The pipeline could cause devastating environmental damage to ecosystems, water, and public health, there have been numerous disasters of late with train derailments, chemical spills, and more that has already caused damage. Imports of dirty tar sands would double with the Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport it to refineries and ports on the Gulf coast for international export. America would not benefit from a drop of oil, but would sustain all the environmental, and other risks. What will America gain? 50 permanent t jobs, an increase in our own gas prices at the pump, of 25 to 40 cents per of gas, and risks. What will the big oil companies, including Shell and that Saudi Arabian oil company gain? Billions of dollars in increased profits, sound familiar?

Please contact your Representatives in Congress and the Senate by clicking on the "Find/Track Politicians, Bills, and Voting Records" page on the grey line above. Once on the page go to GovTrack and by simply putting in your zip code it will find all your Representatives and assist you in contacting them.  The only way we can make a difference is to call and write our Congressmen/women, and Senators. When enough people contact them they have no choice but to listen. Right now only the ultra-rich and corporations have their ear, and the influence, and it's working, FOR THEM. 




[contact-form][contact-field label='Name' type='name' required='1'/][contact-field label='Email' type='email' required='1'/][contact-field label='Website' type='url'/][contact-field label='Comment' type='textarea' required='1'/][/contact-form]

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

“Like Gravity” Fast Track Trade Sinks Jobs and Wages




PLEASE NOTE THAT WE ARE NOW PUBLISHING THIS BLOG ON WORDPRESS AT www.Medic3569.wordpress.com
We will continue to post all articles here as well, but the articles will be posted to Twitter, Facebook, and Google+ from WordPress. Thank you for subscribing to our blog. 

 



“Like Gravity” Fast Track Trade Sinks Jobs and Wages



Image
Graphic by secure3.convio.net




Earlier today I asked my followers on Twitter and Facebook to join me in contacting their Congressmen/women and U.S. Senators to urge them to oppose the “Fast-Tracking” of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement, because it is being negotiated in total secrecy and could end up being a NAFTA on steroids. I understand President Obama wanting to not have to include Congress in the negotiations because they oppose and block everything he does. But, to have this complete deal being done with no one else involved is just to dangerous. If you would like to help, use this link, it will ask for your zip code and immediately find your Congressmen/women and U.S. Senators and give you their phone numbers. If you prefer, they will automatically e-mail all 4 of your Reps.

  http://www.stopfasttrack.com/?congress_success=18

A few hours after I made that request the Center for Media and Democracy’s PR Watch posted this article.
Read the article here.  http://www.prwatch.org/node/12367


PLEASE NOTE THAT WE ARE NOW PUBLISHING THIS BLOG ON WORDPRESS AT www.Medic3569.wordpress.com
We will continue to post all articles here as well, but the articles will be posted to Twitter, Facebook, and Google+ from WordPress. Thank you for subscribing to our blog. 

The Only Way We’re Going To Slow Down the Injustices is to Overturn Citizens United – Your Help is Needed

The Only Way We’re Going To Slow Down the Injustices is to Overturn Citizens United – Your Help is Needed

Image
Who was Guilty of What – Graphic by blogs.reuters.com

Remember the money you had in your 401k when the financial collapse happened? Remember the money you had built up in the equity in your home when the financial industries greed caused a near global economic collapse? We know who has your money! No, they’re not in jail, they’re living very comfortably on your money, and even getting richer while they block all regulation to prevent it from happening again.
The following is from Bloomberg Opinion – Prosecutor’s Balk, Bankers Walk, January 21, 2014.
The chance for senior government officials to make millions of dollars after their public service ends convinces them -– subliminally or not -– to pull their punches. No doubt that’s why Jimmy Cayne, the former chief executive officer of Bear Stearns & Co., continues to enjoy playing bridge and golf, his $400 million-plus fortune, his sprawling mansion in Elberon, New Jersey, and his duplex at the Plaza Hotel.
Dick Fuld, the former CEO of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., testified before Congress that his 2000-2007 Lehman compensation was about $310 million. He later conceded it could have been $350 million. The real number is closer to $520 million, according to people who prepared and studied Lehman’s public filings.
When Stan O’Neal resigned from Merrill Lynch & Co. in 2007, less than a year before it almost went bankrupt, he was given a parting gift of $161.5 million and a board seat — which he still holds — at Alcoa Inc.
Folks these are some of the people that have YOUR money, the money that used to be in the 401k’s, your equity in your house, you know, the money the middle class used to have!
About 3,500 bank executives went to jail after the 1980s savings-and-loan crisis, which wasn’t nearly as devastating as the 2008 debacle.
Not even the oleaginous Angelo Mozilo, the former Countrywide Financial Corp. CEO who walked off center stage with a net worth of about $600 million, has spent time in jail for creating and selling billions of dollars of squirrelly home mortgages that found their way into the securities that Wall Street sold to investors.
When Tim Geithner, the former Treasury secretary, takes over as president of Warburg Pincus LLC, the private-equity firm, even a high-school dropout can discern a pattern.
When the general counsels at JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp. and Deutsche Bank AG — Stephen Cutler, Gary Lynch and Richard Walker, respectively – previously had been directors of enforcement at the SEC, the picture becomes perfectly clear.

Read More:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-21/prosecutors-balk-bankers-walk.html?alcmpid=view

If we are not successful in getting the states to pass resolutions to get the Congress to overturn Citizens United, and even worse, if the U.S. Supreme court sides with McCutcheon in McCutcheon v FEC, which they probably will because the same “Conservative-5″ are still there, we are only going to see things get worse in many areas, the least not being income inequality. So far 16 states have passed resolutions, there are over 120 organizations working on getting these State resolutions. Join in, go to www.United4thePeople.org to be a part of getting our Republic back!


Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Senator David Vitter (R-LA) Announces Run For Governor of Louisiana, Remember the "Vitter Amendment" he Wrote That Had No Basis in Reality


Senator David Vitter (R-LA) Getty Images explaining a situation he had with "Hookers." Photo by Getty Images.
Sen. David Vitter announced on Tuesday morning that he will run for governor of Louisiana in 2015.
PLEASE check out my blog post fully explaining why the "Vitter Amendment" had no basis in reality, because Congress and their Staffers GET EMPLOYER-PAID HEALTH INSURANCE! Their paid health insurance is considered part of their salary and the Office of Personal Management (OPM) simply would not of allowed Senator Chock Grassley's bill to force the Congress and staff to buy insurance through the Affordable Care Act exchanges. It's as simple as that. But to this day you can hear hear TeaPublicans say the President gave Congress a "exclusion" from the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare,) which just is not the facts.

http://medic3569.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-vitter-amendment-is-total-bs.html

"I believe that as our next governor I can have a bigger impact addressing the unique challenges and opportunities that we face in Louisiana," Vitter said in a Youtube video launching his gubernatorial run.
The conservative Republican said that while his "active campaign" won't start until next year, he has already laid the groundwork for it by holding hundreds of listening sessions across the state. He said if he becomes governor it will be his "last political job, elected or appointed. Period."  Read More from Politico

We have a tough fight in 2014 and one reason is because of the gerrymandering state legislators are doing and the Voter ID (suppression) laws that Governors have implemented in 34 states. We need to take back control of the State Legislatures and not allow people like Mr. Vitter to govern any state.

[contact-form][contact-field label='Name' type='name' required='1'/][contact-field label='Email' type='email' required='1'/][contact-field label='Website' type='url'/][contact-field label='Comment' type='textarea' required='1'/][/contact-form]

Sunday, January 19, 2014

What is the Republicans/TeaPuplicans Plan for Jobs Since they are Blocking Every Jobs Bill the President Endorses?

Similar to Healthcare - We don't Have a Plan; But We'll Block Any Plan You Have For Jobs Mr. President


Bobblehead S. E. Cupp, on CNN's Crossfire this week, had Former Labor Secretary, (under President Clinton,) Robert Reich (who helped create a net 22 million job increase) and Governor Tim Pawlenty. and what she had was Republican talking points, typical of right-wing media and talking heads. She kept spewing prepared Republican/Teapublican talking points, not listening, or even hearing what her guests were saying. What is the Republican's plan for creating jobs? They don't know, but they know their willing to obstruct any ideas the President has, sound familiar? What's their plan for healthcare for 40 million Americans that didn't have it, and/or couldn't afford it? OH! That's right, they don't have one, but they spent taxpayer money to the tune of over $60M voting 48 times to repeal the Affordable Care Act.  Here's just a snippet from the conversation on CNN's Crossfire where Governor Pawlenty says what he thinks business is saying, and what Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich said to set him straight:
   
PAWLENTY: "Guess what? There's a consistent answer from those folks about what they want. And they basically say to government, do things to encourage me, not discourage me. Make the load lighter, not heavier. And that includes things like taxation, like energy policy, like health-care policy and more. But they're basically saying don't do things to make my life more difficult, more expensive, more bureaucratic, more inefficient."
CUTTER: "Well, Governor..."
REICH: "Actually, it's..."
CUTTER: "Go ahead."
REICH: "Stephanie, I'm sorry to interrupt you, but I just want to say that -- that I'm very proud to be part of an administration that presided over the creation of 22 million net new jobs. That was the Clinton administration."

 See the interview from CNN's Crossfire Here

Original meme by www.Facebook.com/StoptheObstructionistTeaParty and www.Medic3569.blogspot.com

What Does Raising the Minimum Wage Do? Help or Hurt Job Creation?

Republicans and Tea Party members say that government wants to force employers to raise wages, raise taxes on "top job creators," (which we absolutely know has been proven not to be true that the "trickle down theory" by cutting taxes on the rich creates jobs,) and force employers to cut-off hiring at 50 employees to avoid the Affordable Care Act mandates, is not a recipe for creating jobs. Robert Reich speaking on raising the minimum wage says: "Raising the minimum wage, we've been raising the minimum wage in this country since 1935. Raising the minimum wage is good for the country. It puts more money in the pockets of people. Sixty-five percent of Americans want to raise the minimum wage. Most minimum- wage workers these days are not teenagers. They are breadwinners. If you help them, you are helping the economy overall."
"And a lot of employers will benefit from a higher minimum wage. We know empirical studies show that. This is not a matter of government planning. This is a matter of doing what we have done in this country -- in fact, if we had a minimum wage today that was as high as it was in 1968, adjusted for inflation, it would be $10.40 an hour. And if you add in productivity improvements, minimum wage actually would be $15 an hour."

 A large swath of economists agree, raising the minimum wage is a good idea. 

 In a letter released Tuesday, January 14, 2014 through the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, 75 economists, including seven Nobel Laureates, argue that the government should hike the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour by 2016 and then peg future increases to inflation. A proposal from Senate Democrats, backed by President Obama, to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour is currently stalled in Congress. Read More from The Huffington Post. Economist Joseph Stiglitz and Larry Summers, argue that the "weight" of the evidence indicates past minimum wage hikes haven’t hurt the job market.  

 "Research suggests that a minimum-wage increase could have a small stimulative effect on the economy as low-wage workers spend their additional earnings, raising demand and job growth, and providing some help on the jobs front."

Original meme by www.Facebook.com/StoptheObstructionistTeaParty and www.Medic3569.blogspot.com

 Republicans Say President Holding Up  "All There Jobs Bills"

 The problem with that statement is that they don't have ANY jobs bills. So how do they get around that? Call every bill a "Jobs Bill." On Speaker John Boehner's Blog page he says that the White House is "pivoting" back to jobs and the House doesn't have to pivot because they have always been about jobs. He offers a list of "Jobs Bills," the problem? He lists numerous bills, but in the description of the bills offers misleading or straight out false information. He lists bills that favor the oil & gas industry by more deregulation (remember, after 300,000 people in West Virginia had their drinking water contaminated by a Koch Brothers affiliated chemical company he said "there are plenty of regulations in effect.") and bills that help the ultra-rich with more tax relief, etc., but none of the bills actually create a significant number of jobs. Check the Speaker's page and then check the actual bills at www.GovTrack.us.

But for Boehner, the best course of action is to cut off those struggling most, while asking the Senate to pass the “jobs bills” already approved by the House.
What “jobs bills”? As it turns out, Boehner has decided that every time House Republicans pass a bill that advances House Republican priorities, the party gets to label that a “jobs bill.” The GOP approved more oil drilling? That’s a “jobs bill.” The GOP voted to take away health care benefits from millions of Americans? That’s a “jobs bill,” too. The GOP disapproves of clean-air regulations? “Jobs bill.” The GOP wants more “transparency” in federal spending? “Jobs bill.” Republicans cut food stamps? “Jobs bill.”
I’m not exaggerating in the slightest; this is all from the list of “jobs bills” the Speaker of the House has pulled together and presented to the public. How many actual jobs would be created if these bills became law? No one knows because Republicans never submitted them for independent economic scrutiny, but GOP leaders are confident the answer is, at a minimum, some.

Photo by legalinsurrection.com
  What the Republicans "Say" and "Do" are Different, as Usual
Republicans came out this year saying they have a "Jobs Agenda," and it's not just the same old "cut taxes to the rich job creators" and "remove all those pesky regulations that tie the hands of industry." 

Nationwide, many our lifeline systems are approaching a different kind of catastrophe. One trillion dollars is the price tag on the U.S. infrastructure deficit, an issue President Obama knows well.

“We must rebuild our infrastructure and find new and clean sources of energy,” Obama said.
Quietly and consistently, infrastructure is emerging as one of the three key elements of Obama’s clarion call to returning to the domestic agenda.

Second only to jobs—above even energy—infrastructure, that critical and unsexy topic has come to the fore of the president’s mind and message.

Back in June, 2011 The U.S. Conference of Mayors, put forward a resolution to Congress that the $126 billion dollars going annually to pay for America’s wars abroad be spent at home instead.

The mayors set an agenda that mirrored the presidents: jobs, sustainable energy, and rebuilding America—roads, dams, water and sewer systems, among others.

“That we would build bridges in Baghdad and Kandahar and not Baltimore and Kansas City, absolutely boggles the mind,” L.A.’s flamboyant and outspoken Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said. Read More from The Daily Beast June 23, 2011 article.

Michael Tomasky in an article The GOP's "Jobs" Hypocrisy for The Daily Beast on January 3, 2014 writes about a piece by Michael R. Strain of National Affairs "A Jobs Agenda for the Right" whereas Michael makes some suggestions to the Republicans. It includes, ready? wait for it, INFRASTRUCTURE! Where did we hear that before? One particular part of Michael's work is this: 

 "This employment crisis is one of the most important and immediate social and economic problems facing the country today, and none of our elected leaders can afford to ignore it. Yet both parties are more or less doing just that. The Democrats talk about jobs policies, but their approach to the problem — with its emphasis on massive short-term fiscal stimulus and inefficient public spending — has proven neither popular nor (at least in the form attempted at the beginning of the Obama years) up to the challenge. It consists of the timeworn economic mantras of the left and is not equipped to address the problems we now have.

 Republicans are, if anything, worse off. They often refuse to even acknowledge the problem, or to acknowledge the fact that it requires ambitious policy solutions. They, too, mostly repeat familiar formulas from their party's glory days which offer proposals that do not seem well connected to today's economic realities. Some of their ideas — fostering a more stable business climate and financing lower tax rates by shrinking a few tax loopholes, for example — could help, but they are not nearly adequate for the challenge America confronts. To offer the public a plausible agenda for a true recovery of the labor market, Republicans will have to dig deeper."
  
 He continued "Anyone who has driven on a highway in Missouri or has taken an escalator in a Washington, D.C., Metro station knows that the United States could use some infrastructure investment. And expanding public-transportation options from poor neighborhoods to commercial centers could increase economic mobility and the incomes of the poor — a goal conservatives should certainly support. Today's low interest rates only increase the desirability of a multi-year program of high-social-value infrastructure spending.

 The 2009 stimulus bill failed to direct funds effectively to such projects, but that does not mean that infrastructure spending, if properly conceived and directed, cannot do a great deal of good. And, of course, to ensure that federal debt is on a stable trajectory, any large increase in spending should be coupled with restraints on the future path of middle-class entitlement spending and a reining in of tax expenditures.

 Carefully targeted infrastructure spending should also be coupled with a more pro-growth monetary policy. Monetary policy surely offers the best way to boost aggregate demand in the short term. By keeping the federal funds rate at zero and pursuing its long-term asset purchase program (known as quantitative easing or QE), the Federal Reserve has done much to support the economy during the Great Recession. But growth is still slow and the labor market is still very weak. Is there more the Fed could do?"

 Back to Michael Tomasky "UM, O.K. There are people who’ve been trying to do just that. And not only Barack Obama. John Kerry led this effort in the Senate, and he was joined by Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison (who’s since retired). Their attempts to fund a modest infrastructure bank were supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. But it could never get anywhere because of rock-solid GOP opposition. Does Strain not even know this? Or is he pretending it never existed so he doesn’t have to deal with the political reality of Republican obduracy?

I think, of course, it’s the latter, and there’s further evidence for my guess in the way Strain talks about recent history. The 2009 stimulus was not a failure in infrastructure terms at all (has he read Michael Grunwald?). But even if you believe it was an infrastructure failure, or have to say so for political reasons, should you not acknowledge in fairness that it was Democrats and liberals who wanted it to have more infrastructure spending, and that nearly 40 percent of bill took the form of tax cuts because that’s what Republicans demanded (before they decided en masse to vote against it anyway)?"

Meme by waliberals.org

President Obama's Proposed Jobs Bills

First there's  The American Jobs Act which calls for:

1. TAX CUTS TO HELP AMERICA’S SMALL BUSINESSES HIRE AND GROW.

2. PUTTING WORKERS BACK ON THE JOB WHILE REBUILDING AND MODERNIZING
    AMERICA.

3. PATHWAYS BACK TO WORK FOR AMERICANS LOOKING FOR JOBS.

4. TAX RELIEF FOR EVERY AMERICAN WORKER AND FAMILY.

5. FULLY PAID FOR AS PART OF THE PRESIDENT’S LONG-TERM DEFICIT REDUCTION
    PLAN. 
Learn more at www.WHITEHOUSE.gov

 80% of our infrastructure is deemed "obsolete" or "in need of immediate repair." Infrastructure bills in the past have gone through the House and Senate with ease, but that's before the day after our current President's first inauguration where Senator Mitch McConnell laid out the 1st priority of the Republican Party, which was to "make the President a one-term President." That was their first priority, not the wars, not the great recession created by President George W. Bush, who came into office with a $500M surplus and left with a $10B deficit, with two unpaid wars going on, one of which President Bush out right lied about to get us into. Or the unpaid "Prescription Drug Bill" that cost us over $720B that they said would only cost us $320B and gave drug companies a windfall by not allowing Medicare and Medicaid to negoiate the prices of prescription drugs, not the 700,000 jobs per month being lost when President Obama took office, no, first priority was to make the President a one-term President. The Republican Party then started to have other problems, the ultra-rich backed Tea Party started to challenge Conservatives and blocked anything that didn't fit into their absurd agenda. The Republican Party became broken and produced the "Worse Productive Congress in the History of the United States," the 113th Congress. Obstruction was to put it lightly. Closing down the government to try to repeal The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare,) after already spending $59M to have 47 votes to repeal the law may have been the beginning of the fall of the Tea Party, but we'll just have to hope and see in the 2014 elections. House Speaker John Boehner finally stood up to some of the "groups" like Freedom Works, The Club for Growth, and Heritage Action, when the House passed the Ryan-Murray budget. But came right back and said there was no way they were going to raise the minimum wage, extend the Emergency Unemployment Compensation, and said, after Freedom Industries, a chemical company affiliated with the Koch Brothers, contaminated the drinking water for over 300,000 people in West Virginia, that "there are plenty of regulations in place."
 We need jobs, not deregulation, not blocking of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform bill, not Voter ID Laws, not blocking raising the Minimum Wage, not cutting Food Stamps by $40B, not easier permitting processes for drilling and Fracking, not a Keystone XL pipeline that will bring tar sands oil through our country only to go to a refinery in the Gulf owned by a Saudi Arabian oil company and Shell oil, to be exported to China and other nations, that will raise gas prices 25-40 a gallon here in the U.S., not stalling immigration legislation, not spending more than $70B of taxpayer money voting to repeal the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare,) not giving $154B in tax subsidies to corporations like we did last year, WE NEED JOBS!